The First Eco Certified Computer

Lenovo’s M57/M57P “Eco” is the first computer that is certified by the Greenguard Environmental Institute (GEI) (the largest certifier of chemical emissions from building materials and furnishings in the U.S.) after going through rigorous testing for up to 2000 chemical emissions.


Eco is the first ThinkCentre computer made with recycled, post-consumer plastics and is EPEAT Gold and Energy Star ® 4.0 rated. The system comes with Intel vPro technology, Core 2 Duo E6550 / E8200 / E8400 Processor, 2GB DDR2 RAM, 160GB HDD, Dual Layer DVD Burner, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator X3100, and Windows Vista Business.


I found the news very interesting and promising since it is well known that lots of phthalates (for example) in the environment are coming from electronic and computer products. I hope this kind of certification takes care of that too. Via a Bunch off Greens

10% Energy Challenge

powerswitch.jpgThe National Environment Agency (NEA) is organising the 10% Energy Challenge to encourage households to reduce their electricity usage. In this national campaign, households who reduce their energy consumption by 10% between May and August will stand to win lucky draw prizes. The prizes include a hybrid car, energy efficient refrigerators and air-conditioners, LCD televisions and lighting products. NEA will also send out Energy Efficiency information kits to households, which contains useful tips on saving electricity.


This 10% Energy Challenge will tackle increasing energy consumption by households and help them save money. Households consumed 6,820 GWh of electricity in 2007, which is about 18% out of the total electricity generated (37,420 GWh in 2007) in Singapore. Energy consumption by households have also increased by 78% from 1995 to 2007. This is a result of higher standards of living with increased usage of electrical appliances in homes. NEA’s CEO, Mr Lee Yuen Hee, believes that “the choices Singaporeans make about how they use energy at home will help them manage overall household costs as well as help mitigate climate change.”


Check out more details about the 10% Energy Challenge from the Energy Efficiency website or from NEA’s news releases - NEA to households: cut your energy bills by 10% and NEA to step up efforts to promote Energy Efficiency. Via Asia is Green

Bush Blames Congress for High Electricity, Food, And Gas Prices

ANWR, EIA, Graph, oil production

This morning on NPR, President Bush tried to blame congress for the nation’s high gas, food, and electricity prices. Apparently, Congress has been thwarting the President’s attempts to fix the economy:


“I’ve repeatedly submitted proposals to help address these problems,” the president said. “Yet time after time, Congress chose to block them.”


The President proposed dealing with high gas prices by “environmentally safe” drilling the the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, better known as ANWR.


“It’s been more than 30 years since America built its last new refinery, yet in this area, too, Congress has repeatedly blocked efforts to expand capacity and build more refineries,” Bush said.


Drilling in ANWR makes perfect sense, since it would supply 876,000 barrels of oil per day to a country that consumes 20,687,000 barrels of oil per day. To put that in perspective, 876,000 barrels is about 1 hour worth of oil, or over the course of a year amounts to about 15 days of US oil consumption.


Of course, we wouldn’t reach 876,000 barrels of oil per day until production peaked in 2025, assuming the oil started flowing by 2013. According to an analysis by the Energy Information Administration back in 2004 (that’s where these numbers come from), peak oil production in ANWR “might reduce world oil prices by as much as 30 to 50 cents per barrel, relative to a projected 2025 world oil price of $27 per barrel.”


Even if the analysis was spot-on about the price of oil (only $100 dollars off), would 30 to 50 cents make a difference? The analysis went on to say that OPEC (being OPEC) would probably “countermand” any change in price by reducing an equivalent amount of oil exports.

So how is it going to help the average American to drill in ANWR? It probably wouldn’t. With oil at $120 a barrel and rising steadily, the only thing that’s clear is how lucrative the proposal would be for oil companies.


Bush also mentioned lifting federal gas and diesel taxes (18.4 cents and 24.4 cents per gallon, respectively) over the summer, another move that would make a huge difference in long term energy security. I think Barack Obama is right about this one: it’s a “gimmick that won’t provide any significant relief to motorists.”

At a meeting with voters in North Carolina on Monday, Mr. Obama said lifting the gas tax for three months would save the average consumer no more than $30, a figure confirmed by Congressional analysts. Mr. Obama has previously dismissed Mr. McCain’s proposal as a “scheme.”

“Half a tank of gas,” Mr. Obama told his audience. “That’s his big solution.”

How about raising petroleum taxes and investing in renewable energy infrastructure? How about setting up a tax on carbon emissions like British Columbia just did? Anything but continuing to invest so heavily in a resource that’s on its way out.


It’s time to start looking for real solutions, and gracefully acquiescing that it’s the end of an era.


To hear Bush’s speech, listen to the NPR show from this morning. Have a comment on this topic? Share it below. Via Gas 2.0

'Small wind' power plants are blowing strong

On a recent sunny afternoon Bob Loebelenz pauses to gaze 72 feet into the air at the spinning blades of his wind turbine, a small "clean, free electricity" smile creasing the corners of his mouth.

While giant wind turbines that supply power to utilities sprout along ridgelines across the United States, far smaller residential wind generators, like the one Mr. Loebelenz erected in 2003 to power his suburban Boston home, are still unusual in densely populated places.


That may be changing. Across the country signs are growing that "small wind" (a category that includes wind generators geared to supply a single home) is catching on in suburban and even urban settings.


"My phone has been ringing off the hook," says Mark Durrenberger, president and founder of New England Breeze, a Hudson, Mass., wind and solar power installer.


Improved generator technology, more financial incentives, rising electric rates, and energy-security concerns have opened the way for small-wind power to bloom in unlikely places.


"Small wind really seems to be taking off for residential, small business, and farm use," says Trudy Forsyth, leader of the distributed wind program at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colo.


The installed capacity of "on grid" small-wind residential generators has almost tripled, from 1,300 kilowatts nationwide in 2006 to 3,000 kilowatts last year, says the American Wind En­­­ergy Association (AWEA), a Washington-based trade organization. The number of residential installations rose from 400 to 1,200 units in the same period.


Supplying that tiny but red-hot market are dozens of new companies that have popped up since 2000. Though a half-dozen companies dominate the market, AWEA tracks about 45 US manufacturers. With demand strong overseas, too, the US is the world leader in small-wind power, exporting more than half of what it sells.


"The growth we're now seeing in small-wind residential in the US is impressive," says Ron Stimmel, who tracks the small-wind market for AWEA. "Advanced technology and electronics have made these units more reliable, and more states are now offering incentives to build them."


At least 26 states have tax or productivity incentives or other subsidies to support wind energy, Ms. Forsyth says. But strong growth is happening even without the federal tax incentives enjoyed by solar panels and big utility-scale wind turbines, she notes. Via CSmonitor

ICP Solar Expands Distribution Relationship with Wal-Mart

ICP Solar Technologies Inc. (OTCBB: ICPR, FRANKFURT: K1U.F), a developer, manufacturer and marketer of solar panels and products, today announced that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT), the world’s largest retail distributor, will now carry the complete line of Coleman® solar chargers including the CL100, CL300,CL600 CL1200 and the CC4000 charge controller on Walmart.com.

"We are thrilled that Wal-Mart.com has decided to carry the complete line of Coleman® solar chargers. Having our products selected by the premier retailer in the world validates the consumer benefits of our innovative solar products and gives us a powerful distribution channel to raise consumer awareness and drive revenue growth,” said Sass Peress, ICP Solar chairman and chief executive officer.


“This line expansion continues to build on the success that our CL-300 solar charger is having in over 2000 Wal-Mart stores across North America,” Tom Clark, ICP Solar’s VP of Sales-Americas. “Our portfolio of products that bring solar into consumers’ homes and lifestyle resonates with retailers whose customers look for the combination of features and value that our line of Coleman® chargers provides. We look forward to continuing to grow this relationship as we continue to provide customers with clean-energy alternatives.”


The Coleman® chargers come with best in class features, a 2-year warranty and will deliver over 50% more power per square inch that competing solar chargers.


About ICP Solar Technologies, Inc.
ICP Solar is a developer, manufacturer and marketer of solar panels and solar cell based products and building materials. Through the application of next-generation technologies and use of proprietary intellectual design the Company aims to be the industry's innovation leader. For the past 19 years, ICP Solar has led the consumer market through innovation and has now begun to apply that same philosophy to the OEM, rooftop and power generation segment of the solar industry. ICP Solar's management has over 50 years of experience in the renewable energy sector. ICP Solar is the North American licensee of the Coleman® brand in the solar charger category. The company’s headquarters are located in Montreal, Canada, with additional locations in the USA, Spain, Ireland and France.
Corporate information may be found at www.icpsolar.com
About Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. operates Wal-Mart discount stores, Supercenters, Neighborhood Markets and Sam’s Club locations in the United States. The Company operates in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, China, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Japan, Mexico, Nicaragua, Puerto Rico and the United Kingdom. The Company’s securities are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol WMT. More information about Wal-Mart can be found by visiting www.walmartfacts.com. Online merchandise sales are available at www.walmart.com. Via RE

China Clean Energy: Biodiesel Done Right

In the wake of the looming food crisis, biofuels are becoming more and more suspect as a sustainable long term substitute for oil, and in fact, are viewed as one of the chief culprits in the soaring prices of corn, soybean and other agricultural commodities that are feedstock to biofuels production. The diverted demand of such agro commodities to biofuel production has so interfered with agro production for food that the Chinese government enacted a ban on the production of grain-based biofuels.

chinacleanenergy.jpgChina Clean Energy or CCC (OTCBB: CCGY), a producer of biodiesel (which is the focus of this post) and specialty chemicals (green chemistry is a ripe topic for a future post!) based in the city of Fuqing in the southeastern province of Fujian, seeks to produce biofuels in a smarter way. Embracing the concepts of “waste-equals-food“, “cradle-to-cradle“, and the “circular economy“, CCC is collecting waste vegetable oil, specifically cottonseed and rapeseed oil and turning them into biodiesel. These feedstock are much more inexpensive than their non-waste versions (i.e. raw cottonseed and rapeseed) because they are not perceived as useful inputs.


Gary Zhao, the CFO of CCC, explained how waste rapeseed oil is used in an exclusive interview with The Green Leap Forward:

Rapeseed oil is typically produced by pressing the fibers of the rapeseed. After the rapeseed has been pressed, there is still some oil left in the residual fibers that are typically discarded In fact some 10% of the oil is still left and it is rich in fatty acid. Through a chemical process, we are able to extract this remaining oil and convert it to biodiesel. As for the leftover fibers, that can further process it to be used as boiler fuel or animal feed.

By using “waste” feedstock instead of raw grains, CCC is able to indirectly continue to use waste grain feedstock which is otherwise prohibited and at much reduced prices as the raw grains (see story on soaring grain prices here), but more importantly, harness a previously untapped source of energy that would otherwise be discarded as waste.


CCC currently has a biodiesel production capacity of 11,000 tons per year, but it has just received US$15 million in financing for a significant expansion that will bring production to 100,000 tons per year by the beginning of 2009. CCC’s biodiesel market is distinctively local in nature. Zhao explained: “Unlike the US or Europe, there is no mandate for biofuel production in China, so the costs of transporting the fuel over long distances do not make [economic] sense.”


Transportation doesn’t make ecological sense either. In fact, one of the biggest criticisms of biodiesel (and other biofuels) is whether the net energy balance of biodiesel is positive or not. In other words, critics have charged that the amount of energy produced by biodiesel is less than, or barely exceeds the amount of energy needed to make biodiesel (including an accounting of the energy needed to harvest the grain through mechanized farm tools and transportation of such grain at various stages of its production cycle).


Biofuel production has also been heavily criticised for diverting away valuable food resources. Such criticisms target the conventional raw grain-based mechanized harvesting biofuel production seen in the US or Europe. The CCC process is distinctive for relying on non-food fuel sources and by focusing on local markets, both in terms of it supply of feedstock and its biodiesel end-customers, thereby substantially reducing energy needs and improving the energy payoff of its products.


Using waste as inputs also contributes to a dramatic improvement in the economics of biofuels production. One of the key insights (see #3 in link) gained by an venture capitalist, Michael Butler of Cascadia Capital, is that:

Waste or waste byproducts are the most sensible alternative-fuel inputs: There’s far less pricing pressure associated with sludge or algae versus corn as long as proven technologies are harnessed. And we’ve also seen that efficiencies soar off the charts if the right waste products are used as feedstock.

Perhaps, then it should come as no surprise that CCC is already operating profitably after only a two years of being in the biodiesel game.


CCC’s medium to long term plans to build biodiesel processing plants in Xinjiang and Hebei are again driven by its business model of “localization”; those two provinces happen to be the top producers of cottonseed in China. Being close to the source of cottonseed leavings will limit transportation and energy needs and also create new markets for its products outside of Fujian.

Zhao thoughtfully addressed concerns of limited availability of feedstock. Taking waste vegetable oil as an example, he explained:

The average Chinese consumes 16 kg/year of vegetable oil. That is roughly 20 million tons/year for all of China. If only 10% of such “ditch” [waste] oil can be recycled, we are looking at an availability of 2 million tons/year. Right now, we only produce 11,000 tons/year of biodiesel.

Zhao pointed out further that CCC entertains the possibility of diversifying further to other waste feedstock, thereby increasing its potential supply base.


“China is already the world’s largest importer of grain based products,” Zhao accounted, “and as the standard of living of China increases, consumption of pork, beef and chicken will increase… all these animals require grain.”


“We will never use food-based feedstock. We don’t believe in it.”

Via Asia is Green

Indiana Green Bank Uses Wind, Solar + Geothermal

I call dibs on this prediction: to the extent that banks can keep themselves from drowning financially, we're going to see a huge proliferation of green branches over the next five years. The guy on the video uses the word "fad", but I think we all know it's more than that. This branch here, First Federal Savings Bank, is located in Mishawaka, Indiana and just opened last week. The local press gave the retail pad some pretty positive coverage, as you can tell from the images, video, and diagram. The LEED Registered, $2.5 M branch relies on a wind turbine, solar panels, energy efficient windows, Agriboard compressed-straw panels, permeable pavers, and geothermal heating and cooling.

++A Different Green for Banks [South Bend Trib]

Interior

Diagram - Click to ENLARGE


Hybridparking

Via Jetson Green

SolarCraft Completes North Bay Scottish Rite Solar Electric System

SolarCraft installed the OnEnergy™ system by Sharp. The solar electric systems utilizes (168) Sharp 187 kilowatts solar panels. The OnEnergy system uses a unique racking design that streamlines installation and improves the aesthetics of the system. The ultra-low profile design is highly visible from the road and very pleasing to the eye. Scottish Rite’s new system is expected to generate 44,950 kilowatt hours annually, and spans 2,677 square feet, providing the majority of the electric needs for the Santa Rosa facility.


The solar system will enable the Scottish Rite facility to generate enough clean electricity each day to power 13 average homes. The new system will spare the air nearly 23 tons of harmful greenhouse gases annually, equivalent to the air filtering of 5 acres of trees. Over the next 30 years, the air pollution saved will be comparable to driving over 1.6 million miles. A sound investment, the system will pay for itself in approximately 6 years.


About Scottish Rite
It is a branch of Freemasonry designed to supplement and amplify the philosophical teachings of the first three degrees. The Scottish Rite claims to build upon the ethical teachings and philosophy of Blue Lodge Masonry through dramatic presentation. The Scottish Rite is sometimes called the "University of Freemasonry" because it uses extensive allegory and drama in its Degrees to explore the philosophy, history, ethics and ultimate truths that guide Freemasons' lives.



For over ten years, the Scottish Rite Masons, Northern Jurisdiction, have been national leaders in the effort to help children and their families overcome the painful obstacles of dyslexia.

SolarCraft is one of the most experienced solar energy contractors and retailer in California. For more than 24 years the certified “Green Business” has been providing Solar Thermal and Solar Electric services including consulting, design, installation, monitoring and maintenance. SolarCraft has installed more than 4,300 solar energy systems in California with over 1.3 million square feet of solar collector surface area, saving customers more than $7 million annually and preventing production of more than 28,000 tons of greenhouse gases every year. Via RE

Gamesa Solar & Ener3 Acquired by First Reserve

First Reserve Corporation has completed the acquisition of Gamesa Solar for a total consideration of EUR 261 million [US $406 million]. First Reserve has also acquired Italian solar company Ener3. The company plans to use these assets to create a European renewable energy group with the ability to deliver solar capacity of up to 400 megawatts (MW) in Southern Europe over the next four years.

"Gamesa Solar has delivered 40 MW of photovoltaic projects and with an additional 50 MW to be completed within 2008 is a major solar developer and turn-key contractor."

-- Paolo Pietrogrande, CEO, First Reserves Renewable Energy Group

First Reserve expects that two thirds of this capacity will be delivered to customers, on a turnkey project basis, while the remaining capacity will be developed on its own account.

"Gamesa Solar has delivered 40 MW of photovoltaic projects and with an additional 50 MW to be completed within 2008 is a major solar developer and turn-key contractor. Its leading position in the Spanish market provides an excellent foundation to exploit the attractive solar development opportunities that exist in Southern Europe and the Mediterranean," said Paolo Pietrogrande, CEO of the new group. Via RE

Here Come the Solar Tech Financiers

Joseph Brakohiapa is thrilled to hear about how scientists are making solar cells more efficient at converting light to electricity. But he'd much rather be making a sale of solar panels.

Brakohiapa is the CEO of Clean Power Finance, one of a growing number of young companies that are spending their brain power on software and financing, rather than photovoltaics.


On Friday, his company announced a deal with German solar panel manufacturer Conergy, which will recommend Clean Power Finance's Web-based software tools and financing options to Conergy's network of distributors in the U.S.


Clean Power Finance was started by Gary Kremen, a serial entrepreneur known for having purchased popular domain names including Sex.com.


The founding idea behind Clean Power Finance, SolarCity, Sun Run, and other solar financing upstarts is that purchasing solar panels should be like deciding on a car lease.


That is, the math should be straight-forward: if you can save money on your monthly electric bills, then it makes sense.


Green pitch
Right now, buying solar panels is not an easy financial decision because of the large up-front costs--on the order of $20,000 to $35,000 before tax credits and rebates.


That means that rooftop solar installations are mainly going to "green" consumers, or corporations that can get beneficial long-term financing terms.


The problem is that many of those green consumers already have panels, Brakohiapa said.


"For the industry to continue to grow in the residential space, we have to appeal to the mass market and find ways for the everyman to step into solar and get the benefits," he said. "At some point, it's going to be difficult to convince people to make large investments simply based on the fact that it's green."


SolarCity is taking essentially the same tack with its solar lease program that it introduced to a handful of states earlier this month.


When customers choose to lease the equipment, they can expect the money they spend on energy per month to go down, according to company CEO Lydon Rive. They also have the option of purchasing the equipment at a certain point.


Clean Power Finance's is trying to develop lease program that would appear nearly the same to consumers. Right now, it offers loans to consumers through banks either based on their credit rating or secured by a mortgage.


Another financial product is a residential power purchase agreement, which means that consumers buy the electricity from the panels at a pre-determined rate--the same structure typically used by corporations.


CRM for solar guys
In addition to financing, Clean Power Finance has written what is essentially a version of Salesforce.com tailored for solar installers.


The hosted application keeps a database of state tax incentives, the electrical production information of panels, and utilities' electricity rates. Using it, installers can generate an accurate proposal that includes financing options.


Another start-up using Web-based software to speed up the sales process is Sungevity, which has a program for allowing people to quickly get an estimate on a solar installation using satellite data.


In general, solar installers are more technical and don't have the sales and marketing skills to close deals when they have consumers' attention, Brakohiapa said.


"Solar is still a technical sale. Installers are more comfortable talking about kilowatts but the consumer really isn't there," he said. "Tell me that if my monthly payment to the utility is $500, I can get it to $450. Then I'm in."

Tech to the rescue?
Solar start-ups garnered roughly $1 billion in funding last year to develop more cost-effective solar cells. Experts expect that the economies of scale in manufacturing will bring solar module prices down, too.


Many solar cell manufacturers are targeting utilities first for solar power plants or corporations but expect to eventually sell to consumers. Nanosolar CEO Martin Roscheisen this week said that a "fabulous residential solution" is in the company's near-term plans--in parallel to bringing the cost of solar down to $1 per watt.


That technical progress should aid companies developing software tools and financial products because it brings solar power closer to "grid parity," or the same price as fossil fuel electricity production.


The emergence of in-home displays that show consumers how much electricity they consume--and potentially generate with solar power--can make energy consumption more palpable for consumers than monthly bills.


But companies trying to make solar mainstream through better sales efficiency and financing still have a long way to go.


Solar is still a relatively small market and finding installers in a given region can be a challenge for consumers. The credit crunch--and down economy, in general--has put a damper on matters, making lenders more conservative.


But Brakohiapa expects that Wall Street lenders will eventually get into the solar residential market. They already participate in financing corporate solar installations through companies like SunEdison and SunPower, which signed a deal with Morgan Stanley.


"Some investment banks are realizing that they can reach consumers and they can start investing in energy portfolios," he said. "Over time, we are going to see more players in the financial space." Via News

greening the family

I just stumbled (twittered, actually) onto the coolest website called Green Mom Finds. I had as much fun finding this as when I found Raise A Green Dog! Just like Raise a Green Dog, Green Mom Finds is a really grounded way to get info on healthy living, fun finds, eco-responsible shopping, and just in general living fun!


It is not just for families… being human is the only characteristic you need to dig this site. Actually, even Johann and the other pooches will love the push for pesticide free lawns!


Love it, definitely going on my blogroll… check it out!


Further, Living Green in a Red State is not as in-depth as Green Mom Finds, BUT this one is a one-woman show, chock full of great personal insight as to cleaning products, diapers… or even being “diaper free” (well worth the read for all moms and upcoming moms!). She’s another on my blogroll who can def tell you about greening the family…


So check out all three (Finds, Dog and State) and get a jump on the Rockstar easy ways to get healthier, for you, your fam and your environment!

Via Green Grounded

portable solar fan - what’s up with that?

solarcordlessfan.jpgThe Portable Solar Fan has many features; it possesses a very prominent fan, it’s solar powered, it has an LED lantern, a quartz clock and it charges an MP3 player or cell phone.

I profiled the typical consumer of this product:

  • they’re an off-the-grid camper plagued by an overheated metabolism exacerbated by global warming
  • they’re obsessed with time and blessed with better than 20×20 vision for reading the teensy clock
  • they listen to Shania Twain’s Greatest Hits on their Zune MP3 player while camping in the dark.
Via The AC

50 Simple Things You Can Do to Save the Earth

50-things-to-save-the-earth.jpgThere’s a review of this book that goes by the title “50 Simple Things You Can Do to Save the Earth” and curiosity got the better of me to get to know how I have personally impacted on the future of our planet.


But then it has been around with us since just before Earth Day 1990. A lot of water have since passed under the bridge. Save the forests, there is a website and a rave blog too: 50 Simple Things.


Eco-friendly shopping, for instance, may be fashionable, but critics have argued it won’t reduce global warming. What has been the role of the Green Movement in ecological modernization?


Since the early 1980s, green as a political ideology championing ecological and environmental goals, has given the face of the Green movement, a newer look but not without the usual controversies - global warming, biofuels or agro-fuels in more fluent eco-speak, solar-powered future, etc.


After a lull of nearly 18 years, issues and terms such as Green Building, Green Economics, Fair Trade, Green Marketplace, Genetically Engineered or Organic have subtly found their way in this new edition list too but you can join an eco-consumers association as one thing to save the earth, you are implored. Membership in the Organic Consumers Association will help mobilize one million consumers to end Monsanto’s global corporate terrorism. Monsanto’s Global Corporate Terrorism? How many of Washington’s white collar bureaucrats have their fingers deep in the cookie jar?


At #24, Green Building is not doing badly at all, or the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea at #40; but how about Green Collar Jobs at #50?


Will you vote for green? Sharing a collective term with the Green Party or Greenpeace can be as good as nothing. How come political green groups have failed to win significant levels of the vote in democratic societies despite a rapid growth of public support, and membership of environmental organizations running into many millions worldwide? The headline: Dubya Goes 100% Green will make me laugh, haha.


If you are not driving an electric car, you are probably not green enough. By the way, how far green can it go? We should all have an environmentally-friendly funeral when the time comes? Toast to the Death of Green, to Save the Earth! Via Ecowordly

Kill the Penny for Mother Earth

There are a lot of reasons to end the reign of the penny. On the top of the list, of course, is that they are, in fact, worth more melted down than at the grocery store. If you got a hundred pennies and melted them down, you'd actually have $1.40 of metal...mostly zinc.

First, that's just not sound economic policy. Second, it's a waste of zinc, the mining of which is an environmental disaster. The demand for zinc, mostly due to growth in China, has skyrocketed, and wasting the metal on a coin that is, in general, a nuisance, is foolish economic and environmental policy.

Unfortunately, there's no quick fix. Switching to the nickel as our cheapest unit is confusing, especially in places with uneven sales tax. Transactions would, according on a bill proposed by Representative Jim Kolbe (R - AR), be rounded to the nearest five cents. But people aren't a big fan of paying more for a certain amount of stuff...even if it's just cents.


Of course, no one minds when the gas pumps automatically round up to the nearest penny...but who cares about a fraction of a penny, right? For that matter...who cares about a penny? The change would only affect monetary transactions. Credit card and interest payments would still be made to the penny. Australia underwent a similar change in 2002, eliminating both its one- and two-cent pieces, without much of a stir.


With the rising cost of zinc, and the slumping power of the dollar...the pennies' days are numbered. Already, they're difficult to keep in circulation because people don't like to carry them around, and they simply pile up in jars and car seats waiting for their CoinStar fate. Maybe Lincoln can find a new place, on a dollar...or two dollar coin. I'd hate to lose him all together.

Via Ecogeek

100 MPG Prius Coming in July

Hymotion, a division of advanced battery maker A123Systems just emailed us to tell us that they're finally commercializing their plug-in Prius conversion module. The Hymotion L5 battery pack can be installed into any 2004-2008 Prius for just $10,000, giving it a fuel economy of more than 100 miles per gallon while the charge lasts (30 to 40 miles.) If you want to get a plug-in Prius straight from Toyota, you're going to have to wait at least three years...probably more.


The Plugin Conversion Modules (PCMs) will be available beginning in July and you can reserve one right now for a measly $1000 deposit at Hymotion's website. While the cost is, frankly, a little outrageous, I won't be surprised if they sell out pretty fast. It's one thing to have the greenest car on your street...it's quite another to have the greenest car in your city.


That kind of one-upsmanship isn't going to fuel the entire EV revolution, but it will provide it a good foothold.


The L-5 PCM comes with a three-year warranty on the whole system, including the battery...which is better than nothing. But if it's going to cost me $10,000, it would be nice to know that it was going to work for longer than a few years. If you're interested, and already a Prius owner, you'll want to make sure that you're near one of the approved dealerships in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, Boston, or Minneapolis.

Solar for rent

A solar panel installers has come up with an idea to allow customers to embrace solar before it gets to the price level when everyone will be able to afford it: to lease photovoltaic solar panels for their roofs. Currently, buying panels may set you back $20,000, which not everyone can afford.


California-based SolarCity, based in Foster City, thought up a lease scheme to relieve the solar power financial pain. Under the company’s lease program, customers with a small home could pay as little as $70 a month for a 2.4 kilowatt system. And customers who sign up before July 31st pay nothing until then. After that, upfront costs should be between about $1,000 and $3,000.


Currently the program is only available in California but it will soon be expanded to Oregon, Arizona and the East Coast. Via Energy Refuge

U.S. Oil and Gasoline Import Statistics

I actually started on this post about a year ago, and forgot about it until recently. Here I provide 2007 numbers on the sources for oil and gasoline imports into the U.S., courtesy of the Energy Information Administration.


For 2007, the Top 10 exporters of finished gasoline to the U.S. in million barrels were:

1. United Kingdom 25.147 million barrels (total for the year)
2. U.S. Virgin Islands 23.590
3. France 11.209
4. Canada 10.605
5. Netherlands 10.518
6. Norway 8.406
7. Germany 8.351
8. Russia 7.387
9. Italy 7.239
10. OPEC Countries 5.516


Source: U.S. Imports by Country of Origin


Europeans have a higher per capita demand for diesel. Since you get diesel and gasoline from the refining process, they can get rid of their excess gasoline by sending it to the U.S. That helps keep gasoline prices in check, but obviously does nothing for diesel prices. Take a look at recent diesel prices to see what gasoline prices might look like if not for the imports.


For 2007, our Top 10 exporters of crude oil to the U.S. in million barrels were:


1. Canada 680.533 million barrels (total for the year)
2. Saudi Arabia 530.245
3. Mexico 514.48
4. Venezuela 419.841
5. Nigeria 394.856
6. Angola 181.215
7. Iraq 177.009
8. Algeria 161.755
9. Ecuador 72.138
10. Kuwait 64.306


Source: U.S. Crude Imports by Country of Origin


If you compare to the list for gasoline imports, Canada is the only country common to both lists (although "OPEC Countries" in total came in at #10 on the gasoline list). Any surprises on that list? I am surprised to see Ecuador in the Top 10. I would have thought Brazil would have come in higher than Ecuador (Brazil was 11th). Also note that Mexico and Saudia Arabia swapped places in 2007 - and this situation is likely to be permanent.


Total OPEC imports in 2007 were 1.97 billion barrels. Total non-OPEC imports were 1.69 billion barrels. Consider how dependent we are on oil, how oil prices have run up, and the resulting massive transfer of wealth out of the U.S. and into other countries.


This is a big reason that I am pessimistic about the U.S. economy recovering any time soon. A lot of discretionary income is disappearing from American pockets and ending up flowing into the hands of oil exporters. An obvious solution is to do more business with these oil producers, and offer them something of value that will pull more of that money back. I am also basing many of my personal finance decisions based on the premise that this trend will continue.

The Oil Drum



Smog = Early Death

Only this time the National Academy of Sciences is saying it.

Check out part of the press release:

Based on a review of recent research, the committee found that deaths related to ozone exposure are more likely among individuals with pre-existing diseases and other factors that could increase their susceptibility. However, premature deaths are not limited to people who are already within a few days of dying.

In addition, the committee examined research based on large population groups to find how changes in ozone air concentration could affect mortality, specifically to determine the existence of a threshold — a concentration of ozone below which exposure poses no risk of death. The committee concluded that if a threshold exists, it is probably at a concentration below the current public health standard. (all emphasis mine)

Now, remember how the U.S. got a weaker clean air standard because our administration took cost into consideration but not health?

The White House has consistently expressed doubt over whether a clear link exists and, you may recall, still hasn’t released the documents from the EPA addressing the health risks of smog exposure.

Yeah, this new report totally contradicts all that. Via Asthma Mom

Solar Poetry

solar poetry

Light passing through the One Day Poem Pavilion’s perforations creates a poem that changes according to the solar calendar. During the summer solstice, the poem is about “new life”. During the winter solstice, the poem’s theme is the “reflection and the passing of time.” Each hour, a new line of the poem is revealed by the passage of the sun. Via Ecoscraps

Military Green Tech: Pics of A Solar-Powered Predator

Unmanned war machines are out in force in the war on terror. Last year there were 5,000 military robots deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, up from 162 in 2004. And these semi-autonomous robo-warriors aren’t just your terrestrial terminators — they’re taking flight with the help of solar power.

Aurora Flight Sciences has unveiled its plans for an unmanned aerial vehicle that uses solar cells on its wings and body to propel itself and stay aloft for five years for longterm intelligence, surveillance and communication missions, Cleantech.com reports. We contacted Aurora and the folks there were kind enough to send over these awesome snapshots.


Part of the appropriately and terrifyingly named Project Vulture, the Odysseus has a z-wing configuration that can be self-adjusted to maximize the power output of the solar panels while cruising through the stratosphere. Like something straight out of Voltron, each of the three 50-meter wide sections is actually its own self-sufficient aircraft capable of detaching and completing its own mission.

Project Vulture is being run by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Boeing and Lockheed Martin also have contracts under program. Once the first phase of development concludes, phase two will put the aircraft up in the air for an uninterrupted three-month test flight to be followed by a year-long flight. Via earth2tech

British Weather: So-lar, So-Good?


Britain is not known for good weather. In fact, to be honest, the weather is lousy, and at certain times of the year only the most foolish Englishman ventures out without an umbrella.


For this reason, solar power has long been discounted in favour of wind on this blustery island where one’s neighbours are likely to raise a few eyebrows should one be so eccentric as to cover the roof in solar panels.


This was certainly on the mind of Ashley Seager when he laid out the princely sum of £8,500 ($16,900) in 2007 for the installation of a 3 kilowatt solar power generation system for his South London home. However, one year later and despite a year of weather that has been poor even by British standards, Ashley’s investment is beginning to pay dividends having generated 92% of the Seager household’s annual electricity requirement.


Global warming has not yet turned the British Isles into a tropical paradise, but this experience demonstrates that solar energy is still a viable option, even the most dreary climate, resulting in electricity bills low enough to bring a little sunshine on even the rainiest day.


But - there are a few caveats..


The payback time on the Seager’s solar system will be approximately 13 years - not the shortest investment, and for a British family considering the same investment today the payback time will be even longer; Until recently the British government offered a 50% grant on home solar installations -which has now been capped at £2,500 due to demand, forcing many solar installers out of business despite the rapidly falling cost of the technology. (in comparison, Germany - whose government offers generous renewable energy support - fitted solar installations to 130,000 homes last year compared to 300 in the UK).

Secondly, payback time is greatly influenced by the fluctuating cost of energy. Solar systems generate electricity during the day which goes mostly unused whilst the family are at work or school. The excess electricity is sold back to the power company and then re-purchased in the evening when the sun has set and energy use is at it’s highest. Although rising electricity costs increase savings, most power companies in the UK buy electricity from solar homes for less than the price at which they sell it back again. Again, in comparison, those renewable-crazy Germans buy electricity for twice the price at which they sell it.


The complex regulations, grants and tariffs which surround micro renewable energy are still shifting as the UK government tries to land on a sensible set of long term energy policies. This uncertainty makes solar a more unlikely option for the less well-heeled, but the savings and the eco credibility factor certainly mean that the Jones’s may soon be swapping those raised eyebrows for solar panels.

Via Ecowordly

Maybe the world is flat

As CindyC wrote a week ago, many people who believe it is futile to make personal changes and conserve natural resources often like to point out that the conservation effort in the U.S. will be completely overshadowed by the sharp increase in countries like China and India.

So when I heard about the US-China Green Energy Conference, I had to find out for myself whether China was undertaking any effort to reduce its environmental impact. My impression from the conference was that

  • China was trying to the best of its ability, but the effort was insufficient
  • It wasn’t going to let the green house gas emission slow down its economic growth
  • We in the west were all contributing to its economic growth and its massive emission by sending over product orders

The Chairman of the Chinese Academy of Science presented three green technologies currently being widely deployed in China – solar water heating, wind power and biogas.

  • 80 million solar water heaters have been deployed in Chinese households
  • The low cost implementation of wind power generators has put China in the top 5 countries in terms of installed wind capacity
  • As early as 2005, 216 billion cubic feet of biogas has been generated from domestic animal waste to power 14 million rural residence

china-solar-water-heaters.jpg
(Solar Water Heaters: courtesy of Global Environmental Teaching)

He also pointed out somewhat ironically even though most of the solar panels had been manufactured in China, they were too expensive to be adopted there. Yep, the reality is that it is a thriving economy based on low labor, material and operation costs. He said, China is dubbed as the “world factory”. You wonder how Wal-mart can sell crappy toys for $0.5.


The director of the Energy Research Institute, who shared a piece of the Nobel prize (being on IPCC ) gave the attendees some stunning statistics about the growth in China. By 2030, 85% of the infrastructure in China (buildings, transportation systems, communication systems, etc) will be built or rebuilt – brand new country in the next 20 years. It is nightmarish to imagine how much natural resource and energy this unprecedented construction will consume. China has been focusing on rapidly increasing energy efficiency. Buildings codes are being overhauled (he cited that more than 18 billion square feet of new buildings are erected every year), production infrastructure is being adjusted, urban planning is being redesigned, transportation systems are literally being built.


I was exhausted just from listening to this. I saw a picture of absolute chaos with environmental protection completely lost in the midst. Even though it brings a new coal firing plant online every week and it imports petroleum like there is no tomorrow, the “world factory” still does not have enough fuel. Out of necessity, the country is forced to explore energy efficiency and alternative energy sources.


The silver lining was that both the Chinese directors believe that China will hit carbon emission peak around 2030. It that too late?


The conference went on to discuss new alternative energy options and issues. Absolutely fascinating. I won’t detail here.


It was overwhelming to digest what I had learned from the conference. However I certainly did NOT walk away from the conference thinking that it was futile for us to make changes in our lifestyle. In fact, the “world factory” notion made me even more determined to consume less. Majority of the finished products from the “world factory” are shipped all over the world in big container ships. It is at best disingenuous for us to lament how it is all so useless to conserve energy in the U.S., as we are sending non-stop orders to the “world factor” to pump out products to satisfy our consumption. Aren’t we at least one of the big culprits for the pollution? Makes Cruchy’s Buy Nothing Challenge all the more worth doing, doesn’t it?


Via Organic Picks

Water Footprint

A new calculator has been released to help us consider our environmental impacts. Dutch researchers have released a water footprint calculator.


According to their figures, a single apple has a footprint of 40 litres, 1 kg of soyabeans has a footprint of 1,800 litres, one kg of chicken 3,900 litres and 1 kg of cheese 5,000 litres. And, the mother of all resource consumers, it takes 16,000 litres of water to produce 1 kg of beef.


Nationally, 70% of Britain’s water useage is outside of the country, compared to only 19% of the USA’s and 4% of Ghana’s footprint. But then, the average person uses 2,483 cubic metres of water a year in the USA compared with 1,245 in the UK and 1,293 in Ghana. So the USA is using more water per person, but more of it is nationally rather than internationally provided.


So how useful are these figures?


Well, water is clearly a scarce resource in many parts of the world and treatment of water in industrialised countries uses a lot of energy. So it makes little sense to be importing irrigated crops from developing countries with particular water problems or to waste expensive water resources in developed countries. One future scenario suggests that conflicts may occur in the future over water, and that we may have to start dealing with waterborne diseases like cholera in developed countries that eradicated them many years ago.


On the other hand, climate change models suggest that the rainfall pattern will change, not reduce. This might mean that some areas benefit from increased rainfall, whilst many other countries suffer from reduced rain.


So all water is not the same — it depends where you live and where you’re getting it from. An apple might only need 40 litres of water to grow, but if you live in an area of relative water plenty, it might have less environmental impact than if it had been grown elsewhere and shipped to you. As with all of these types of calculators, assumptions have been made and we need to be careful about how we use the conclusions.


But this underlines the wisdom of reusing our own waste water, growing our own vegetables and eating less meat.

Via Celsias

10 Day Trips From NYC

1. Great Adventure: Went here so many times in my youth. I still love amusement parks….just don’t have time to go anymore. NJ Transit gets you there if you don’t have a car.

2. Cape May: Victorian beach community. There are lots of activities this weekend, including a house tour and wine tasting.

3. Renaissance Faire: Go for the goof! People actually dress up and act all Ren. And I’m not talking about the actors! Probably as geeky as a Star Trek convention.

4. Skydive the Ranch: Get a group of friends together and just do it! You have an instructor strapped to your back. You won’t regret it! Better than sex!

5. Jones Beach: Go for the beach. Stay for the concerts.

6. Woodbury Commons: Major tourist destination for European travelers. Get on the bus with them to these outdoor premium outlets.

7. Fire Island: The best thing about Fire Island…no cars. Although my gay friends would tell you the best thing is “the scene”.

8. Dia Beacon: How can I forget Dia when I live just up the road? Take Metro North. Spend the day in Beacon. Come say hello!

9. Elephant’s Trunk: A country flea market in Milford, CT. Good deals to be had.

10. Kyuit : The Rockefeller estate in Westchester. Gorgeous mansion, gardens and artwork.

Via Reclaimed Home

Empowering people for the greener good

Techniques for encouraging greener practices
The Canadian Center for Pollution Prevention has some great techniques to promote greener behavior among employees. Here's a sampling.

1. Set clear targets. Establishing a specific, attainable, measurable goal, such as "cutting energy waste by 20 percent in a week" is easier to get behind than a vague objective such as "Let's cut waste significantly this year."

2. Connect behavior with results. By sharing energy and waste figures with staff, you show how their actions make a difference. One interesting project currently under way at Yahoo to encourage waste reduction among employees: The Green Screen. Set up in the cafeteria in the Yahoo's Sunnyvale, Calif., headquarters, the Green Screen lets users view and compare the energy consumption stats, in real time, of Yahoo's two buildings in terms of watts, CO2 emissions, or costs. "Our hope -- since moving to a period of year where electricity in California gets interesting -- is that we'll be able to link that information on the Green Screen to energy response initiatives on campus," says Yahoo's Page.

3. Provide concrete examples. Offer specific guidance as to what employees should do to cut waste, including printing double-sided and in black-and-white; turning off monitors, PCs, and lights; and unplugging chargers.

4. Put expectations in writing. Add green policies to corporate documents such as employee handbooks and job descriptions (e.g. "Employees are encouraged to report inefficiencies and to suggest improvements"). Remind staff of these policies during orientation and training sessions.

5. Use visual and auditory reminders. Decals, stickers, and signs hung around the office can be effective reminder for employees to turn off lights, reduce printing, and so forth.

6. Make people feel good about their actions. This ties in to rewards, which again, need not be monetary. Public recognition and praise, for example, can be very effective.

What does your company do to encourage greener behavior?

Via Infoworld

GreenWave to Harvest Wave Power in SLO & Mendocino

Note: Back in October 2007 GreenWave first applied for a FERC Preliminary Permit. In January 2008, FERC informed GreenWave that their application was ‘deficient.’ In early March 2008, GreenWave filed letters supporting their applications, attempting to overcome the areas of deficiency claim.

DAVID SNEED, The Tribune of San Luis Obispo

A Southern California company is eyeing the coastline off Montaña de Oro State Park to study the feasibility of an emerging renewable energy technology—converting wave action to electricity.

GreenWave Energy Solutions LLC has laid claim to a three-mile-wide swath of ocean a mile off the tip of the Morro Bay sand spit to Point Buchon —17 square miles in all — in which it hopes to eventually test the feasibility of wave power.

The Thousand Oaks company has applied to federal energy officials for permission to do the study.

“We’re still early on in development, but we feel there is a tremendous window of opportunity to do this,” said Wayne Burkamp, a San Francisco attorney who is GreenWave’s president.

The application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a preliminary permit would not give the company permission to put wave energy devices in the water. Rather, it would give the company three years to study the feasibility of wave energy.

“It’s like a mining claim,” said Allison Detmer, director of the state Coastal Commission’s energy program.

The application is one of several before FERC laying claim to coastal waters of California for possible development of wave energy.

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. recently received a preliminary permit to study the feasibility of wave energy off the coast of Mendocino and Humboldt counties.

GreenWave also has an application for the Mendocino coast. Wave energy projects are also in the works in Oregon and Washington.

The San Luis Obispo County project is the southernmost.

Undecided technology

Neither the PG&E nor GreenWave applications state what type of wave energy devices would be used.

Two types are under development, Burkamp said. Both use the up-and-down motion of waves to generate electricity. One consists of a snake-like line of tubes floating on the surface of the ocean that undulates as waves pass by. The other employees a buoy that uses the pitching and heaving motions caused by waves to generate power.

GreenWave officials aren’t providing additional details on what technology they might use.

“Given the time horizon for getting through the permitting process (which could be years) and the uncertainties of what the technologies will actually look like, GreenWave believes it would be misleading to provide detailed specifications of a technology at this stage,” Burkamp wrote in the application to FERC.

A wave power facility off San Luis Obispo County could generate as much as 100 megawatts of power, the application states. That’s enough power for about 90,000 homes.

By contrast, Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant generates 2,200 megawatts.

The company anticipates spending as much as $2 million during the initial feasibility phase, while actual installation of a wave-power facility would cost as much as $40 million.

Regulatory hurdles

According to the application, GreenWave’s study area is one to three and a half miles offshore and seven miles long. Wave energy components would not be visible from shore, Burkamp said.

“A project area of this size is required to allow flexibility for performing the necessary assessments and properly siting the project components,” the application reads.

This area was chosen because of its abundant wave action and its proximity to Morro Bay. The city has a port and power plant, where electricity generated by a wave power plant could land and hook into the power grid, Burkamp said.

He said a test project could be in the water within a year to a year and a half. However, Coastal Commission officials say the establishment of a wave power facility anywhere in California is years away.

“This industry is very young, and they need to do a lot of testing first,” Detmer said.

Wave power facilities would also face many regulatory hurdles. Burkamp estimates that a facility would require 26 federal, state and local permits.

Placing wave energy devices in the water and laying transmission lines on the ocean floor would both require coastal development permits, Detmer said. Projects located farther off shore than three miles would be under the jurisdiction of the federal Minerals Management Service.

Environmental groups are reacting with caution to the recent interest in wave power. They support the idea of renewable energy sources such as wave power, but are waiting for details about specific projects.

“We think it’s important that all of these projects proceed with caution,” said Rick Wilson, coastal management director with the Surfrider Foundation. “Even though this is clean, green technology, there can be potential impacts to fishing and environmental impacts.”

Possible environmental impacts include noise, increased vessel traffic and blockage of whale migration routes.

Via MCC

World First LEED Platinum Certified Museum Celebrates Water + Life




Welcome to the world's first LEED Platinum certified museum. The $40mi dollar building is the Water + Life Museum and is located in Southern California.

The impressive 70,000 square foot structure built by Lehrer + Gangi Design features heat blocking glass, natural light emitting windows, smart interior lighting, radiant floor heating and cooling , drought tolerant landscaping, drip irrigation utilizing reclaimed water, 540 watt 3000 panel photovoltaic installation that provides roughly half the museums energy needs. The result is a museum that celebrates earth on every level, from the exhibits to its energy use...and heck, it also manages to look really good.

To learn more about the project go to Lehrer + Gangi Design SITE

Climate analysis of Kanye West’s Flashing Lights

Our friends over at Brighter Planet just posted this fascinating video of the CO2 impact of Kanye West’s Flashing Lights video. I like that the tone isn’t serious or doom and gloom, but like, “hey, did you know…”. It’s smart to frame this type of information within the context of pop culture, since it makes a solid connection between everyday actions and the impact it has.

I’d love to see more examples of this type of thing. Maybe this concept has the potential to be as viral as spoofs on MasterCard’s “Priceless” campaign?

Via Green Search



Wal-Mart's Green Index

Wal-Mart's tracking adoption of certain "green" products among its customer base, showing which ones are leading and which states are further ahead. The adoption rate is the percentage sales of these products in the overall category.


Among the findings:


- CFLs (compact flourescent lightbulbs) are at a 19.7 percent adoption rate.
- Organic milk, 1.58 percent.
- Eco-friendly cleaning products, 4.77 percent. Product launched in January.
- Organic baby food, 4.12 percent
- Extended-life paper products, 67.5 percent
- Sustainable coffee (fair trade certified, USDA organic, or rainforest alliance certified), 0.35 percent. Product launched in April.


The figures on CFLs were encouraging. Remember when Al Gore implored people to swap out their light bulbs at the end of "An Inconvenient Truth?" But other figures left me scratching my head.


I wondered what "extended life paper products" actually were. As it turns out, this does not mean they have recycled paper content. All it means is the roll is four-times larger than average. Why does that qualify as a green product? Because it saves on driving trips to the grocery store to pick up toilet paper and on packaging. By this logic, any supersize offering would qualify as green.


The figures, while up, also show how modest they are for categories like organic milk. Via Chews Wise

Affordable Electric Cars Coming to US in 2009

Think City, electric car

While we love hearing about sweet rides like the $100K Tesla Roadster, a functional and economical electric car made for the rest of us would be even cooler.


This could be it: the Th!nk City electric car, a four-seater with 110 mile range and top speed of 65 mph, priced under $25,000, made from 95% recyclable materials, and available in the U.S. in 2009.


The Th!nk City electric car is the product of Norwegian firm Th!nk Global, an auto manufacturer backed by Silicon Valley funding who has plans to assemble the cars in Southern California. In contrast to Tesla’s limited release of 300 cars per year, the Th!nk City is designed for mass production to the tune of 30-50,000 units within a few years. Th!nk already produces about 10,000 of these cars in Europe annually.


As an interesting aside, Ford Motor Company originally developed the vehicle, but (in a move they may soon regret), sold it to Norwegian investors in 2003. Why is it so cool? Because most of us don’t drive more than 40 miles in a day, and small electric cars are optimally suited for congested city driving. The benefits are pretty obvious, but if you’re worried about getting out for the weekend with the Th!nk City, don’t. Use it for city driving and keep that gas-guzzling SUV for forays into the mountains. You’ll still come out ahead.


Safety-wise, the Th!nk City meets the strict safety requirements of both Europe and the US as a highway-safe road car. ABS brakes, airbags, side-impact bars, and an advanced frame designed to absorb energy and distribute it away from the passenger’s compartment make it another blow to the myth that bigger cars are inherently safer.


If recent sales trends toward smaller vehicles are any indication (sales of Toyota Yaris up 70%), the Th!ink city could be very popular when released in the US. Via Gas 2.0

Happy Earth Day to You!!!

This Earth Day let’s break it all down and see things for what they are.

Our world is in a state of climate chaos as a result of our conveniences. This CleanTechnica blog is an opportunity to see what is being done worldwide in the realm of clean technology (ie. renewable energy, alternative fuels, sustainable products and services etc…) so that we can keep these conveniences.

That’s terrific–I’m glad it is being done, but this Earth Day I’d like to say–F your conveniences!

Here are 22 (since it’s April 22nd) things you can do daily that are inconvenient but we would all benefit greatly if everyone did them. And, to be honest–they’re not that inconvenient. They may in fact be just inconvenient enough that when you do them you get the rewarding feeling that you are doing something to benefit the greater good (ie. earth, and its many earthlings) besides simply donating to a charity once a year during the holiday season.
I know we live in a country full of citizens more excited that Starbucks has a drive thru than Toyota has a Prius, and will not be truly satisfied until Starbucks has a video camera mounted a mile from it’s store so it can read your license plate to anticipate your arrival and have your drink ready for you by the time you get there. Then all you’d have to do is slow down enough for the “barista” to throw your “coffee” into your car as you rolled by with your window down. After all, complete stops are for suckers! I digress…

Those people are out there in large numbers–and they are probably not reading this blog, so it’s up to you to send it to them because these 22 inconveniences can change the world.

This list is pared down from the original 78 I started with. Instead of overwhelming you (as much as I’m in an “I’d love to overwhelm the world” mood right now) I widdled my original list down to its current state. Also, I am hoping people will add to my list through the comments section (atleast one please!) and we’ll end up with a list even better and (dare I dream) more overwhelming than my original 78!
Here we go:
1. Buy a rain barrel. You can’t drink the collected water, but you can water your lawn and wash your car with it. You’ll save thousands of gallons per year in the process!
2. Turn off your TV!!! Atleast limit your TV watching!
3. Drive less. Walk, bike, skip, skate, and stroll, more. This way you can get some fresh air while running an errand, and you’ll feel (and look) better in the long run.
4. Use natural fertilizers on your lawn and garden. Harsh chemicals found in conventional fertilizers are bad for your lawn and all who play on it. Also, it harms our groundwater supply.
5. Replace old bulbs with CFL’s and/or LED’s.
6. Compost. Keep your food scraps separate from your garbage to reduce your waste and to keep any household plants or vegetables extra healthy.
7. Recycle. By recycling and buying products made from recycled goods we save natural resources AND put less toxic chemicals into our food chain.
8. Shop less. C’mon, you don’t really need it anyway. But if you HAVE to shop atleast shop sustainably.
9. BYO shopping bag. When you NEED (not want) to shop, use your own bag–you’ll save trees and keep harmful chemicals (from making plastic bags) out of the environment.
10. Use a low-flow showerhead. You’ll save a lot of water. May I also suggest showering less and showering with a friend? Yes I may.
11. Use power strips. By plugging many appliances (ie. your computer and printer and scanner and stereo) into a power strip you can turn off everything with a flick of the button. This will save on energy consumption, because even when things are turned off they still suck small amounts of energy (see: phantom loads).
12. Turn off everything (except your lover). Power strip or not, turn off (or unplug) things when not in use. Turn on your lover in the meantime. After all, the more you’re in bed; the less you’re watching TV, driving somewhere, shopping, etc…
13. Buy local food. It’s good to know where your food comes from. And it’s great to know it traveled 5 miles rather than 500 or 5,000 to get to your table.
14. Buy organic. Pesticides and fertilizers deplete and poison our soil, and our food is ONLY AS GOOD AS THE SOIL IT GROWS IN!
15. Junk junk mail. Start here.
16. Start a vegetable garden. You’ll appreciate food, soil, nature, and compost so much more!
17. Spend time outdoors! And bring your friends and family with you!
18. Take Action! Pay attention to legislation that will benefit the environment, and write your representatives to persuade them to support the environment as well. Collectively we are stronger than ANY lobbying interest!
19. Use your windows first, HVAC second (if at all). Use your blinds to let in or keep out heat. Save the heating or AC for extreme cold or hot weather. And you don’t need it as low or high as you think, so set it two degrees warmer in the summer and 2 degrees colder in the winter.
20. Use natural (plant-based) cleaning products. It cleans as well AND keeps harmful chemicals out of our houses and out of our drains, thereby keeping the chemicals out of our environment.
21. Say no to bottled water! Use your own re-usable bottle. The plastic in our environment and the chemicals from creating the plastic will wreak havoc for generations to come.
22. Talk to people. Don’t be a nag and don’t brag, but let it be known that you do certain things for the good of the environment. People love to follow the leader. Be the leader. But if it’s too late, then be the follower–this time it’s OK!

By the way the “F” in “F your conveniences” stands for “Forget”. What did you think it stood for???

Let me end this post with a great quote from Mr. Mark Twain:

“Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn’t do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.”

Via Clean Technia

Americans are Buying Less Gasoline

According to the Associated Press, gas consumption in America fell 1% in the four weeks preceding April 11. This is attributed, of course, to the soaring gas prices across the nation. One percent doesn't seem like a lot, but I can imagine it's millions and millions of gallons.

It makes me wonder, though. For years, I've heard the argument that the government should raise the price of gas so that Americans would consume less. I have never been a fan of the government legislating something like this. I believe people should be responsible to make the right choices without the government forcing them to. But it's clear that in America, we haven't found it important to make the right choice or, more likely, we haven't thought about it at all. Up until a year ago, I was just as guilty as everyone else. I'm still not fabulous with the gas consumption, but it has decreased significantly in our family.

Are higher gas prices what it's going to take for people to start driving their vehicles in an environmentally responsible way? Or is it just going to hurt those without the money to put gas in their cars to get to work? So many areas in America have poor public transportation systems and some people have no choice but to drive to their job. If prices continue to rise, will public transportation systems be improved?

I don't have any answers to my questions. I certainly am not educated in economics. I didn't do well in the one economics class I took in college. But there is something I do well. I'm great at making lists of ways to be more green, right?

So, tomorrow, I think I'll do a post on ways to conserve on gasoline and get better milage out of the gasoline you do use. Via A Little Greener Every Day

Should Food Labelling Show Water Footprint?

water-ratings-for-food.jpg

The size of food product packaging may have to increase, not contract, if recent thinking on providing more information on environmental impacts was to be enacted. We’ve heard about carbon labelling for food in the UK, now an Australia academic is proposing also adding water impact labelling to the mix.


Speaking from last week’s Water Down Under conference in Adelaide, James Hazelton, a senior economics lecturer from Macquarie University, floated the concept of packaged food carrying a label indicating how much water was used in its production.


"Most of our water usage is embedded in the products we use, rather than drinking or showers and in the garden and so on.” He said. Referring to the UK carbon labelling and water efficiency labels for the likes of washing machines, he pondered, “Could we have a similar scheme for embedded water in the products that we buy?"


"The majority of water consumption is by agricultural industries and in particular things like rice and also meat production," he said. "I think perhaps if consumers knew the quantities of water embedded in those products they might question or they might change their purchasing decisions.”

Via Tree Hugger

How to Save Gas in 10 Seconds… Or Go To Jail

IdlingMyth: It takes more gas to turn your car off and on again than to let it idle.


Fact: Idling for more than 10 seconds damages the engine, emits more air pollution, and of course costs more money in the long run than turning the car off and back on again. This is true for all cars built since the 1970s with a catalytic converter.


And yet…

Idling in the developing world


Oddly enough, in the “developing” world, idling your car is not only accepted, it’s a national pastime.


Here in South Korea, a country where oil is at a premium for lack of any domestic reserves, the belief seems to be, “an idle car is a happy car.” Men, especially, have a love affair with the idle car. Perhaps it says, “Hey, ladies… I have money to burn.” Perhaps it’s just a lack of knowledge about car maintenance and air pollution; perhaps it’s a lack of concern.


The problem of idling is even more severe in countries where oil is not at a premium. On my last visit to Venezuela, I spoke with a man named Pedro, who drives charter mini-buses for a living. I asked him why he idles his mini-buses for hours instead of turning off the engine. He smiled proudly. Why shouldn’t he idle his mini-buses? After all, in Venezuela, petrol is cheaper than water.


So here again, idling is a sign of wealth. It’s a case of “waste to show you want not.”


Legal penalties for idling


You may not know it, but your city, county, state, or province may be one of the many with a fine for idling a car.


In the county of Denver, Colorado, idling a c


ar for 10 minutes could land you a fine of no less than $999 and/or imprisonment for one year. A similar penalty of one grand and a year in the slammer applies to anyone in the county of St. Louis, Missouri for idling a car for just 3 minutes. See a list of idling laws in the United States here.


In Canada, of course, fines are less draconian. Idle a car for 3 minutes in Surrey, a city within the Metro Vancouver area in British Columbia, and you’ll get “dinged” $50.


Were these laws news to you? That’s because there’s clearly a disconnect between the laws and their enforcement. Start arresting St. Louis residents for idling and you’ll have a lot of ticked off Missourians. And who really wants a lot of ticked off Missourians?


The answer, as always, is better education about the true costs of idling. Via EcoWordly

Sick of Going Green?


Everyone that knows me, knows that I am FOR the planet. I'm doing my part for our Mother Earth. BUT. It makes me mad that all these corporations are making commercials that emphasize their wonderful, eco friendly, green, bio healthy ways when they haven't changed a single thing about how they do business!


For example, on cafemom this morning, I saw a "green" Coke ad. Coke? Green? Since when? For every Coke in someone's hand, they are healthier? I do think so! The last time I looked at the ingredients on a Coke, it said HEALTH WARNING on it!


Yesterday, an ad for Subaru, said it's now a zero landfill company. Really? Ask the garbage man if they do a weekly pick up there! There isn't a C02 molecule of truth in that one!


There's a plethora of events for this beautiful planet this month and it's all geared toward consumers. Buy this, buy that, and you'll be green. Here's a word to the wiser.. consuming more STUFF won't make you green! In fact, it's ANTI-green!


If you truly want to contribute to the continuation of the Circle Of Life, just educate yourself about products that YOU ALREADY USE and make a switch to simply choose better ones. Like garbage bags, they make biodegradable ones now. Shopping bags, get reusable ones and use them. Cleaning supplies can be non toxic or don't use them at all, use steamers! And the foods you eat, just stop eating fast food and buying packaged preserved food. And of course, get outside and take a walk!


I blog to share what I've learned about how to ECO-CONVERT your lifestyle without falling victim to corporate greenwashing. Via Eco Converts

Got Solar? Renewable Energy Marketers Association to Launch this Week

344247435_2c0c56d8011.jpgSome have noted that the renewable energy industry needs branding to confront the misconceptions surrounding it. Certainly marketing helped consumption of beef, milk, and pork increase dramatically. Imagine “Got Milk?” or “Milk: it does a body good” or “Pork: the other white meat” translated to renewable energy. Help may be on the way from the Renewable Energy Marketers Association (REMA), which will officially launch on Wednesday, April 23, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. The association, in its own words, “is a trade association of organizations involved in the creation, supply, purchase, sale, advocacy, and education about Renewable Energy and Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) … REMA has formed to vigorously promote the economic and national security benefits of domestic renewable energy.” Its founding members include Sun Edison, Constellation New Energy, and Conservation Services Group. For more information, go to their website.

Via Clean Technia

Composting - the basics

First of all, apologies for the gap in posting - I've had a very busy week what with guests and work, so this is the first chance I've had to update. Hopefully it's been worth the wait...

Composting

Composting is a valuable past time. As well as providing a boost for your plants and vegetables, it helps cut down on waste you throw out, as well as a handy place to dump green and garden waste to avoid having to go to a tip or recycling centre, which are usually sited inconveniently for those who don't drive (plus, it's pretty hard to carry binbags on a bus!). I'll discuss here different ways for varying amount of space, as well as what to put in your heap.

Finding Space for Compost

1. No outdoor space

Most people can compost, as it doesn't take up a lot of space if you just have the one bin. The only real restriction is to those with no garden whatsoever like people living in flats or shared houses - in this case you can still use a Compost Caddy, the handy way to store vegetable waste without smell in your kitchen until you have enough to deposit in green waste bags or donate to a friend with a garden:


We have one of these in our kitchen, in order to store vegetable waste until there's a big stack of it to chuck on the compost heap. It saves having to make loads of trips in the rain or cold with one evening's peelings.

2. Small Outdoor Space


If you do have some space outside, but not a great deal, the best way is to have a plastic compost bin - most councils supply them cheaply to encourage recycling in the home. Below is a typical example:This is best sited directly on the soil, so that worms and bacteria can get in and get breaking down your waste. With this type of compost bin it's particularly important to have a good mix of ingredients to avoid smelly, liquid compost - make sure you mix your kitchen waste with a good bit of carbon, such as shredded paper and cardboard. More on this under "what to put in" below.

3. Large Outdoor Space

If you have a bigger space, and would like to go whole hog on the compost front, a multi-cell compost bin is the way to go. This makes it much easier to turn compost during the process, and you can have a handy three bin system: new waste, processing compost, ready compost.

This can be made from pallets (line with mesh to avoid any rodent invasion - unlikely if you only put in the correct material) as the example from the CAT:


Or a posher tongue and groove system if you have more money or DIY skill:


Or even posher still, brick built (there are some arguments this doesn't allow enough air in - you may want to leave some gaps in the brickwork to allow it to "breathe", putting mesh inside as with the pallet wood).

The most important design features, whichever material you choose, are a removable front to allow easy access to your compost, and some kind of covering to keep the heat in and keep the process of decomposition going. A good material is old carpet, which will insulate well and isn't too heavy. You could also use wood, or even plastic sheeting. Recycle whatever you have lying around - that way you don't have to buy something new, or add to what you're throwing away.

What to put in?

1. Kitchen

Green waste such as vegetable peelings, past their best veg, fruit peel. As well as being full of nitrogen, they add moisture to the heap. Other things from the kitchen you can include are tea leaves, coffee grounds, and egg shells. DONT put in any cooked foods, meat or dairy products. This will attract rats and other pests.

2. Garden

Lots of things from the garden can go in - grass cuttings, any annual weed cuttings (make sure you avoid evil weeds like Japanese knotweed, or you will never get rid of it), hedge clippings, prunings (but nothing too woody, which won't break down), and autumn leaves.

3. Other

Other things you can include - droppings and non-synthetic bedding from small animals such as guinea pigs or rabbits, cardboard and paper, wood ash, and cork. DONT put in coal ash, carnivore faeces, wallpaper, hoover contents.

It's all about proportion... here's the science!

For a compost heap to really work, and break down to form good, earthy, rich compost, you need to get the balance right. There is some science behind this, but it's easy! Basically, you need to make sure you have the right ingredients - balance your green waste (which is rich in nitrogen) with your household paper and cardboard waste (which is rich in carbon). These two, combined with the heat of being confined to the container of your choosing, as well as helpful organisms like worms, fungi and bacteria, will let your heap decompose and form lovely compost.

A word about turning

To get your compost to its optimum state in the quickest time, turning is invaluable. It also helps the different materials in your heap mix together well, and let the organisms within have access to air. This is the most difficult in the single bin environment, as it basically means emptying your bin and refilling it, though will only need doing once or twice a year as the plastic bin makes a good, hot, humid environment for your compost. It is much easier in a three bin system, where the first is for newly deposited waste, that can be shifted to the next cell when it's had time to break down a little, then shifted again into the third bin when it's well on it's way to being finished. Having a bin with an easily removable front and lid helps, as you can have as much access to the heap to turn it as possible - it's best to turn your compost once a month if you can.

Via A Welsh country Life

Should a blogger make some "green" off their blog?

The last few months have been interesting. I started this blog to reach out to moms and readers like myself. I am not granola or crunchy and when I go to my local health food store and pull up in my SUV people sometimes glare at me as though I cannot shop there unless I drive a hybrid, shower in rainwater and maybe have dreads. Sorry, that isn’t me and never will be. I’m not perfect but I try my hardest to be some shade of green each day. I’m not trying to make green cool either or doing green stuff to be cool. My belief is this: to do thing for the environment and our children we don’t have to go extreme. I have a lot of experience with moms and social settings due to past job experiences, and when moms get scared of something or if something feels overwhelming they are going to look the other way, run away of just plug their ears. I have had to tread very lightly when introducing “scary” topics to new moms because some of them will go to the extreme without the education or knowledge and this is not good either.

This blog is growing in leaps and bounds and yes, the New York Times blip helped, but I mostly think it is because there are so many of us moms out there that want to do something but don’t want to go extreme or made to feel bad because they have an SUV or don’t buy organic milk. Does that mean that you don’t care about the environment or your children? Come on, this isn’t high school and we need to stick together not bully each other or judge so harshly.

This has all lead for a huge influx of press release notices in my inbox, emails from small start up companies wanting me to look at a product or review it. Frankly, I have not been equipped to deal with this or prepared. I’ve researched it, read some posts but there are opinions on each side of the fence (go figure). That’s when I realized that I had to think long and hard this and start to take my blog seriously and think of it like a business. A great post over at Sparkplug CEO , made me realize this after my husband harped on me for being taken advantage of and not being a good business person. The catch was, I did not see my blog as a business and that was my mistake. I was spending time looking at products, doing reviews, taking pictures, researching, writing and not charging one penny for it because I wanted to share it with you AND it was fun. So why can’t I make money, share stuff with you AND have fun? PR firms and companies know that blogging is influential so why I can’t I leverage that to my advantage? It gives me more another stream of income, adds value to my time, better products, contests and reviews for you and can help support a better functioning site and design.

I had a great conversation with Erin over at, The Queen of Spain Blog , the other day because I wanted her “expert” opinion and she was so wonderful to even give me the time of day. She had some great recommendations and made me think about whether paid posts would be a conflict of interest and if paid posts were honest opinions. I really did think about this but then I came to Anne-Marie Nichols website, The Write-Spot , and her disclosure on reviews and paid posts happen to fit my own thinking. If a blogger is going to be “transparent” and lay it all out on the line and isn’t hiding something from you then you know you can trust them. I read many great blogs that accept paid posts but I know this and when I read the bloggers honest opinion I go back to them. That’s why they keep getting paid. PR firms and companies know that a post is far more powerful than a side banner or button because a paid post does not go away. A post with a mommy review on it whether it is paid or not is advertisement and more powerful then any other form because it is word of mouth. Exactly why I love network marketing because it is word of mouth and that is the best kind. I don’t even watch television anymore or read magazines, my influences are bloggers like myself.

You can probably guess the end result here and if you see my new disclosure policy you’ll learn more. Does all of this mean you can’t trust me and I’m blogging just for money and all of my posts are paid. He! He! He! Yes. Heck NO!!!!!!! I’m going to be straight up with you and if I’m shopping and see something I love I’m going to blog about it. If a PR company wants my time and help and they contact me and want your eyes and ears to hear MY opinion then yes, I’m going to charge them. This is still a personal blog, written by me and they are my opinions and my integrity comes first. You won’t see me supporting Clorox or Green works for money. If it goes against what I think and believe I won’t do it. If I don’t like it, I’ll tell you. If I love it, I’ll tell you. Want to know if I’ve received payment or a free product for a review? Just look for the label, sponsored post or sponsored review. When I move to word press I can categorize this but until then this what I can do. I'm sure in the months to come more up roar about this will come. I could just not post about this but I figured some of you might want to know what others in blog land are talking about and if I'm going through this, maybe you are too. Via Green Clean Mom

Al Gore Video




If you haven’t had enough of your Al Gore fix, check out his latest video on Current TV. As part of the channel’s coverage leading up to Earth Day, April 20th, the former Vice President asks what inspires all of us in regards to the environment.

If you have something extraordinary to say, say it on a webcam or text by today, April 17th. You may be one of the lucky ones chosen to be part of Current TV’s Earth Day coverage from April 19th-April 22nd.

Here’s an example of a great response if you need some inspiration:


“I know we can’t succeed unless we all become involved. Not just talk about it but become involved. I’m encouraged by communities that have taken individual responsibility instead of waiting on government to implement sustainable plans for them…” Green Search

Food as Fuel

Somewhere, Doc Brown is smiling. OK, OK, he’s aawesome illustration by scottobear (via flickr) fictional character from Back to the Future, but still…


If Metro Vancouver gets its way, it will soon build a plant to convert food waste to fuel. Instead of fueling Deloreans like Doc B did, the plant could power municipal vehicles. Apparently, this is done in Sweden with confiscated booze.


Taking a step back, many worry about the negative impact of biofuels like ethanol. Biofuels production brings a net increase in Greenhouse gas emissions when carbon-absorbing forests and grasslands are burned to yield more cropland. And the competition between food and fuel, among other factors, has sparked serious food price inflation.


That’s why the Vancouver plan makes perfect sense: why not produce biofuel from food that’s just going to be sent to the landfill? Doing so won’t consume any more farm land or the oil and chemicals needed to grow and transport ethanol crops.
But, there’s some debate over the best use for inedible food waste. Some prefer composting. Others would rather see it create energy (via anaerobic digestion) or fuel. Any of these options would be better than the status quo–sending it to the landfill.


BTW, only 2.2 percent of food waste is “recycled” (i.e. doing one of the above options–see page 7). Via Waste Food

Solar Powered Laptop Case

The Voltaic Generator is the first solar bag powerful enough to charge a laptop. It uses high efficiency solar cells to generate maximum power in the limited space available. It includes a battery pack custom designed to efficiently store and convert the electricity generated. It can also charge cell phones and most other hand held electronics.

  • Solar panel generates up to 14.7 watts, powerful enough to fully charge a typical laptop from a day of direct sunlight.
  • The included battery pack efficiently stores the equivalent of a typical laptop charge and automatically delivers the required output voltages
  • Common adaptors are included for easy connection to laptops, phones and other handheld electronics
  • Other devices can connect via USB or car charger
  • Will hold up to a 17″ Powerbook inside a protective case
  • Fabrics made from recycled PET (soda bottles), which is tough, water resistant and light weight

Voltaic Generator $599


Via NewWays

Walking Across America For Climate Change

martin12

Some people are prepared to go to extraordinary lengths to promote environmental alternatives, demonstrating just what is possible in a world that has long been reliant on fossil fuels.

I recently wrote of a Swiss family who are at the half way point of an epic round the world eco journey travelling only by foot, bicycle and wind power. During this journey they aim to cross seven seas and climb seven of the world’s highest mountains.

Now, a Swiss doctor is undertaking an adventure of similar proportions. Matrin Vosseler, in a bid to raise awareness on climate change has walked across much of Europe and the Middle East, sailed a solar powered boat across the Atlantic, and is now walking across the United States from West to East.

Walking with the emblem of the Sun on his back, Vosseler hopes to spread the message on climate change to the 500 to 25,000 people he comes into contact with each day:

Every driver sees me. I wave to many of them and many wave back. They think ‘what kind of person would walk through the United States with a sun on his pack?’. And they eventually connect when they see a report in the newspaper or on television about me. So it’s a tremendous opportunity to spread the message.”

Dr Vosseler is currently somewhere along highway 40, with only a couple of thousand kilometres to walk before he reaches Boston where he plans to hitch a ride with a sailboat back to Europe.

You can follow Martin Vosseler’s progress across America using Google Maps, or find out more about his journey on his personal site (German Only). Via Eco Wordly

5 tips for buying green desktop gear

You may very well prefer to postpone the task of refreshing your fleet of desktop systems and monitors, an exercise that can be both expensive and time-consuming. But inevitably, machines break down or your needs change, so you have to bite the bullet.


The silver lining, though, is that refreshing your systems gives you an op-portunity to invest in greener machines -- those that not only cost less to power but also yield other benefits that can help the planet as well as your company's bottom line.


Following are some points to consider the next time a system refresh looms at your organization. Notably, many of these tips apply not only to desktops, laptops, and monitors -- but any piece of IT gear.


1. Know your needs. Hopefully, you wouldn't buy a high horse-power pickup truck or SUV if you didn't need its extra fuel-guzzling power when a gas-efficient sedan would suffice. You should most cer-tainly apply that mindset to your PC purchase: Higher-end systems with more powerful components tend to draw more energy. Before you shop, consider what your computing needs are for the present, as well as the near future.


For example, you might be a Windows XP shop today but envision mov-ing to Vista in a year. If so, remember that Vista's bare minimum system requirements are an 800MHz processor, 512MB of RAM, a 20GB hard drive with at least 15GB of available space, and support for Super VGA graphics. Then again, you might be contemplating a move to an alternative OS such as Ubuntu, which has minimum requirements of a 300MHz proc-essor, 64MB of RAM, 4GB of disk space (for full installation and swap space), and a VGA graphics card capable of 640x480 resolution.


In a similar vein, be honest with yourself as to what size monitors your users need. Larger screens with higher resolution have higher energy re-quirements -- but some tasks, like video-editing and spreadsheet work, really do scream for a large viewing space.


Finally, give thought to replacing desktop systems and monitors with laptops -- again, if laptops can really suit you and your users needs. From a green perspective, a laptop requires fewer parts to build; it's small and lighter and thus requires fewer resources to package and ship it. In terms of your annual electric bills, a laptop costs less to power than a similarly equipped PC plus a monitor.


2. Embrace energy efficiency. Once you know your needs, try to find a PC or laptop that meets those requirements as well as Energy Star 4.0. That way, you'll know it's got an 80-percent efficient power supply and knows how to make the most of low-power modes. (There's also an Energy Star specification for monitors, which is more dated but still useful.)


Energy efficiency can shave a chunk of money from your annual utility bills, plus reduce your carbon footprint. Energy Star-compliant systems are easy to find, be it through the Energy Star Web site or your preferred computer vendor.


3. Don't disregard other "green" criteria. Green criteria covers a lot of territory beyond energy efficiency, from the materials used to the ease with which it can be disassembled. These criteria not only have environmental implications but also cost-cutting potential.


There are several such factors to consider here and ask vendors about as you shop. The EPEAT (Electronic Products Environmental Assessment Tool) registry breaks the criteria down into several convenient over-arching categories. (You can search the EPEAT registry for products that meet these type of criteria, by the way, down to a granular level.)


a. Reduction/elimination of environmentally sensitive materials. Is it important to you that a machine meets the criteria set out in the EU's RoHS directive, which limits the usage of certain hazardous substances in electronics? Or perhaps you want a machine that exceeds those requirements, using even less lead, mercury, chromium -- as well as little to no PVC and hazardous flame retardants. The benefit here is to reduce the adverse effects e-waste has on the planet and people when it ends up in landfills.


b. Material selection. If you're an advocate of recycling and reuse, it might matter to you if the machine's plastic parts are made from recycled plastic, as well as renewable and bio-based plastic materials. These are certainly an Earth-friendly consideration.


c. Design for end of life. Beyond just the amount of recycled ma-terials that go into building the system, you might be concerned with how well the machine was designed for treatment once it's retired. The easier it is to open the enclosures and remove parts -- and the more reusable parts it contains -- the better for the environment. But it's also good for your company if you see the wisdom in purchasing refurbished machines. (See tip No. 5)


d. Product longevity/life cycle extension. Piece of mind comes with a multi-year warranty: It means the machine was built to last a while. Beyond that, consider asking how well the product was designed for upgrading. For example, was it built in a way that it's easy to swap in parts such as new memory or drives with common tools -- or even major com-ponents such as the processor? (See tip No. 4.) On top of the environmental benefits, those kinds of traits often result in cost savings, making it easier for you to invest in parts instead of entire systems when a machine becomes too dated for your needs.


e. Energy conservation. Beyond Energy Star compliance, you might find out whether there are chargers available for the system that draw on clean energy.


f. End of life management. When it comes time to retire your equipment, it's ideal if the vendor offers convenient -- and preferably free -- recycling services, be it directly or through a third party. Some vendors will even offer incentives on new equipment if you return their older gear to them for recycling.


g. Corporate performance. If you've made a commitment to protecting the environment, you may want to hold those you do business with to a similar standard. Some companies demonstrate this with a corporate environmental policy that meets certain international standards, as well as by producing annual reports on their environmental efforts.


h. Packaging. When you purchase a machine, you also have to deal with all the packaging. You might want to know whether that packaging is easy to recycle, or if the company will take back the packaging for reuse (or at least recycling).


4. Consider doing it yourself. After you've made a list of your needs, take a second look at what you've got. Do your systems really need to be replaced -- or would adding additional memory or a new graphics card do the trick? Depending on how many machines you have at your company (or home office), how well the machines are built for upgrades, and your comfort with do-it-yourself electronics projects, that approach might be not practical. But if you can pull it off, you'll save yourself some money and extend the life of your investment.


5. Go the refurbished route. Major hardware vendors as well as third parties sell pre-owned machines at the fraction of the cost of a new machine; thus you can save a tidy sum while doing the Earth-friendly thing. As with buying a new machine, you'll want to determine your computing needs and green criteria in advance so you make smarter choices.

Via Info World

Jet Wind Turbine - 4 Times More Efficient

flodesign wind turbine

Flodesign’s jet engine shaped wind turbine is designed to be an amazingly 3 to 4 times more efficient than standard wind turbines. Present day wind turbines only capture 50% of the air flow, cannot stand high winds, have high building standards, require many trucks to deliver parts for 1 turbine and have to be built tall and away from habitable areas. Due to their large size, the large turbines force air around it instead of through it and during high winds they are usually turned off or break due to their huge slow spinning blades.


Flodesign’s wind jet turbine is designed to be made simple and small, giving it the ability to handle high wind velocities due to its effectiveness to handle off axis flow and turbulence. Slow air on the inside flares out while the fast air on the outside is deflected in. When the two flows meet at different angles they create a rapid mixing vortex. A “fin” placed on top of the Flodesign wind jet turbine has the ability to automatically align to wind direction. In addition, it can be disassembled to fit in one truck vs the traditional wind turbines which will need several trucks to just deliver parts to 1. With the costs estimated to be 25-35% less and the added ability to place these turbines closer together, who would say no? Via Got2begreen

The Sunny Day Compact Solar Electric Bicycle

sunny.jpg

In the future, bikes will fold, zoom around without human assistance, and generate their own power. Such are the ideas behind the first-place winning design by Larry Chen for the 12th annual International Bicycle Design Competition.


Called the Sunny Day, this bike has solar panels integrated into the streamlined design that helps reduce drag when on the move — and then flip up when parked to take advantage of the sunshine. The bike can also fold up quite easily allowing urban commuters to compliment their journey with mass transport. The idea is to create something that is largely independent from the grid, power-assisted, and easy to take with you.


It’s still on the drawing board, but with some cash from the competition — and a few willing investors, perhaps Mr. Chen’s design will cruise past us in the coming years.

Via Groovy Green

Tesla sues, Fiskers Karma catches up with them?

tesla.jpg

The two leaders in high-end electric sports car technology are now going head to head in the courtroom.

Tesla says Fisker heads, Henrik Fisker and Bernhard Koehler, not only stole their hybrid design ideas while working for the company, but allege that Henrik - hired to style their new sedan, the Tesla White Star - turned over a purposefully substandard design in order to get a leg up once the companies were in competition.

Paid almost $1,000,000 for the bunk job, Fisker used that money to help start Fisker Coachbuild.

Tesla’s claims:

* The bad design set back their production schedule for the company’s lower-cost luxury sedan.

* Fisker and Koehler stole hybrid trade secrets and used them to design the Fisker Karma.

* Fisker knowingly did a bad job to make their product less popular.

If the case is decided in Tesla’s favor, in my opinion, it may be enough to bury Fisker. That’s one reason I’m not sure I believe it all. Why would someone who makes his living designing cars for other companies go out of his way to do a bad job? Why would he steal trade secrets if he depends on the trust of other companies to pay his bills?

It’s an unfortunate case either way, but I look forward to reading all the juicy details.

Via Eco Friendly Driver

New Ways to Store Solar Energy for Nighttime and Cloudy Days

Hopefully they can make this work in the near future.

New Ways to Store Solar Energy for Nighttime and Cloudy Days


The idea is to capture the sun’s heat. Heat, unlike electric current, is something that industry knows how to store cost-effectively. For example, a coffee thermos and a laptop computer’s battery store about the same amount of energy, said John S. O’Donnell, executive vice president of a company in the solar thermal business, Ausra. The thermos costs about $5 and the laptop battery $150, he said, and “that’s why solar thermal is going to be the dominant form.”

Via Getting of the grid

Organic Cotton Onesie for your little Flower….

yhst-16999618421163_1997_1730503.jpg

100% organic cotton brings this sweet onesie for the perfect spring outfit for your little bloomer. Lolababiez has some original unique designs as well …we’ll be giving one away next month, so stay tuned.
$24.00 at Lolababiez

Via Great Green Baby

Four in 10 Americans rather want to see a solution to the gas crisis than a cure for cancer

We have recently seen gas and oil prices skyrocket on the global market, but, how do the rising energy costs affect how Americans prioritize and think?

Well, that was the question behind a recent survey commissioned by the Fairfax County (VA) Economic Development Authority, one of the leading economic development organizations in the US.

700 American adults were asked this question:

What do you believe should be the highest priority, in terms of investing money and resources, in order to achieve a meaningful technological advancement in the next 10 years?

The result might surprise. According to the survey Americans wants a solution to the gas crisis more than they want a cure for cancer, heart diseases or other similar medical breakthroughs.

37% of the people who took part in the survey “thought money and resources should be placed into a breakthrough in fuel efficiency or alternative fuels, while 30 percent wanted the effort placed against an advance in medicine.”

The environment (climate change) was only ranked on third place with 14%.

Security and defence was ranked shortly after the environment with 10%. Transportation and space exploration each had 3% while telecommunication and media was placed at the bottom with only 2%.

The full survey result can be found below:

Top priority for technological breakthroughs?
Surprise: Four in 10 Americans say “fuel efficiency and alternative fuels”

Focus on medical and environmental concerns place second and third in national survey by the Fairfax County Economic Development Authority

Second survey reveals similar priorities among British respondents

Fairfax County, Virginia USA, April 3, 2008 – Nearly four in 10 Americans polled in a new survey say that improving fuel efficiency and developing alternative fuels should have the highest priority for investments that will lead to meaningful technological advances within the next decade.

In a just released national survey, commissioned by the Fairfax County (Virginia) Economic Development Authority (FCEDA, www.FairfaxCountyEDA.org) and conducted by IPSOS Public Affairs, an independent, leading global research company, 37 percent of those polled selected “fuel efficiency and alternative fuels” from a list of seven categories of potential investment. Placing second was “medical” (30%) followed by the “environment” (14%). As a percentage of the total, the other categories registered at 10% or less.

“These results are a snapshot in time of what people believe today should be the focus of technological investment,” said Gerald L. Gordon, Ph.D., president and CEO of the FCEDA. “As one of the world’s most prominent breeding grounds for creative discovery and technological exploration, Fairfax County needs to know what is important to people. These survey results tell us that there is a tremendous interest in new technologies that will address a range of energy, medical and environmental concerns. These are instructive findings for large corporations, emerging startups and the investment community.”

The top line results of the survey, conducted by telephone of close to 700 American adults on March 7-9, were as follows:

If you had to choose from the following categories, what do you believe should be the highest priority, in terms of investing money and resources, in order to achieve a meaningful technological advancement in the next 10 years?

Fuel efficiency and alternative fuels Medical Environment Security and Defense Transportation Space Exploration Telecommunications and Media Don’t know/Not sure

37% 30% 14% 10% 3% 3% 2% 1%

There were some notable demographic distinctions among the findings, including:

  • For female respondents, the top investment focus was medical (33%), which was cited foremost by 26% of men.
  • More than four in 10 men (43%) said fuel efficiency and alternative fuels should be the highest priority, while only 30% of women placed it on top.
  • Forty-six percent of college graduates named fuel efficiency as the number one priority versus 31% for those with high school degrees or less. (The highest priority cited by high school graduates was “medical” at 36 percent.).
  • Respondents in western states cited medical as the utmost priority at 34% versus 33% for fuel efficiency and alternative fuels.
  • Older survey participants were more inclined to select fuel efficiency and alternative fuels – 42% for those ages 55 and older versus 37% for those aged 35-54 and 31% for those between the ages of 18-34.

A parallel survey conducted by the FCEDA in Great Britain found that respondents favored advancements in “medical” technology and “fuel efficiency and alternative fuels” (38% and 33% respectively) above other categories. A desire to see breakthroughs in the “environment” ranked third in GB with 14 percent. As a percentage of the total, the remaining categories registered at 10 percent or less among British respondents, as they did in America.

The top-line results of the survey, conducted by telephone of more than 500 adults throughout Great Britain March 7-9 by Ipsos MORI, were as follows:

If you had to choose from the following categories, what do you believe should be the highest priority, in terms of investing money and resources, in order to achieve a meaningful technological advancement in the next 10 years?

Medical Fuel efficiency and alternative fuels Environment Transportation Security
and Defense Space Exploration Telecommunications and Media No opinion

38% 33% 14% 8% 4% 1% 1% 3%

There were also some notable demographic distinctions among the British findings, including:

  • 44 percent of male respondents said fuel efficiency and alternative fuels should be the highest priority, while only 23 percent of women placed it on top.
  • Women chose “medical” technology as the top investment focus (46%) while men placed medical second on their list (28%) behind fuel efficiency and alternative fuels.
  • Survey participants ages 55 to 64 were more inclined to select medical as their top priority (43%), while respondents 65+ selected fuel efficiency and alternative fuels (36%).
  • In terms of regions, the South East, Wales and the South West chose fuel efficiency and alternative fuels above all other categories (38 and 39% respectively). The Midlands, North England and Scotland all pinpointed medical as their key issue.

Survey Methodology
The FCEDA survey was conducted March 7-9, 2008 by Ipsos Public Affairs, which is owned and managed by research professionals. As part of its weekly U.S. Telephone Omnibus Study, IPSOS interviewed 692 adults ages 18 and older. The margin of error for the entire survey is 4% at a 95% confidence level.

About the Fairfax County Economic Development Authority
The Fairfax County Economic Development Authority (www.FairfaxCountyEDA.org) promotes Fairfax County, Virginia, as a business and technology center. In 2007 Time magazine called Fairfax County “one of the great economic success stories of our time.” It is the Washington, D.C., area’s private-sector job leader and is a major hub for regional economic activity. The FCEDA maintains marketing offices in San Francisco, Bangalore, Frankfurt, London, Seoul and Tel Aviv.

Via Green Blog

Al Gore CSI Climate and the Case of the Unheated Stratosphere

Today, hot on the trail of global warming skeptics, Chief Detective Gore is doing some climate crime scene investigation that takes us to the earth's stratosphere.

Some skeptics posit that global warming is being caused by extra energy coming in from the sun. Gore argues that if this were the case, the stratosphere would be heating up as well as the upper atmosphere which the data presented on his charts disputes.


Al Gore's New Slideshow: CSI Climate and The Case of the Unheated Stratosphere (30 second video) from George Spyros on Vimeo.


Via Trehugger

2,843 MPG Plastic Bubble Wins Eco-Marathon Race

eco marathon, shell, race, fuel economy

The grand-prize winners of the 2008 Shell Eco-Marathon race (pictured above) got an astonishing 2,843 MPG. Then again, is anyone surprised that a plastic canopy hooked to an engine got pretty good gas mileage? Via Ecoscraps

Save 50% on all LED Bulbs @ Amazon

All LED light bulbs are half-off at Amazon right now. Brands include Westinghouse Nanolux, CC Par and CC Vivid. If you haven't yet tried these bulbs which promise to eventually replace even the most efficient CFLs, now would be a great time to give 'em a go. [View deal site]

Via Green Deals Daily

Could Chemical Solar Power Beat Photovoltaics?

Could a vat of chemicals be a more effective way to harness the sun's energy than those fancy, intricately crafted silicon wafers? We're not sure, but Professor Chaurasia of the University of Birmingham, UK, was telling me about that possibility earlier in the month.

He's developing a unique process in which propanol is dehydrogenated using a catalyst and clean, solar energy. The hydrogen then generates electricity - courtesy of a Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cell. The byproduct of dehydrogenated propanol -- acetone -- and the protons (H+) and electrons (e-) then all recombine to form more propanol, which is then ready to start the project all over again.

Very simply, it's a way of harnessing the instability of propanol to push electrons onto the grid. It's not a new way of creating hydrogen, it's a new way of harnessing the sun's power using the versatility of hydrogen, and the instability of propanol. Indeed, it's pretty genius.

But the question of economics remains. Current solar cells are getting cheaper and more efficient every day. And though Chaurasia thinks that his chemical cells could be competitive, that will depend on several factors. The propanol is cheap, PEM fuel cells and titanium catalysts are not, so we will have to wait for these "solar fuel cells" to scale up before making any real judgments.

Chaurasia's most recent paper was published in the International Journal of Sustainble Energy. Via Citizen Power Alliance

EARTH DAY COUNTDOWN: The (Green) Maelstrom

I feel like I’m caught up in a maelstrom of green, green, green! After spending thirty years slogging through the environmental trenches, we seem to have had an “overnight success.” Protecting the planet is all anyone seems to be talking about these days. In fact, as someone who used to be leading the pack, I know find it hard to keep up! Companies are frantically setting up recycling programs. Organizations are issuing reports hand over fist. Entrepreneurs are churning out new green gear and gadgets faster than a mouse breeds babies.


All of which makes for a very exciting time to have a new environmental book out – especially one that aims to make sense of what’s “green” versus what’s being “greenwashed.” That’s the question I’ve been asked most frequently, especially during the dozens of radio interviews I’ve done since the book’s pub date March 1. Everyone wants to do something to make a difference. Not everyone knows where to start, or what purchases are really worth the money. Words like “natural,” “biodegradable,” and “eco-friendly” throw people for a loop. Do they really mean the product or service deserves Mother Nature’s green star? Not necessarily, and a big part of my job right now involves directing shoppers to certified goods that actually live up to their marketing claims.


I’ve been impressed that so many people have turned out to my book signings – given that another big concern for people who want to go green is lack of time! Most people don’t realize that being "eco" can actually simplify your life – sometimes I need to roll out the light bulb example to prove my point (a compact fluorescent light bulb lasts ten times as long as an incandescent, so put one in and forget about it for seven years…).


Woman_bulb Speaking of light bulbs, perhaps what’s most gratifying about the book is watching the proverbial light bulb go on behind people’s eyes when they realize how much clout their consumer power has. This has been especially true for women, most of whom haven’t realized before that, because they spend $.85 of every dollar in the marketplace, they have the power to tell manufacturers what to make (rather than constantly hear from companies about what they should buy).


If not just the book sales, but the e-mails, too, are any indication, women are glad to throw off the old cliché about “loving to shop” as they embrace their potential to become the true arbiters of the new green marketplace. What's not to love about that? Via Big Green Purse

Santa Monica Alt Build Expo

For anyone who lives in Southern California or who will be in town the week after next, this is a must attend. Very cool event that will get you quickly up to date on the latest and greatest in "green" building opportunities. If you're planning a project this is a great way to see what's out there and if not, it's just a great way to start thinking about things. Via Achieving Sustainability

Eating at Wendy’s Could Have Green Benefits

How many of us catch lunch or dinner when we can? Are you driving up to the drive-in window more than you like to due to a hectic job, children with multiple activities or caring for family members? Does the person at the other end of the microphone recognize your voice?


I find myself in this situation many times during the week. I know. Eating at fast food places is not the greenest or healthiest places to eat. Sometimes, it is just unavoidable. How can you possibly interject a little green into a fast food situation? Well, if there is a hamburger, there is a way.


Slowly over the years I started saving parts of the dinner or lunch packages since I realize how much I was contributing to the landfills. First, I started collecting straws. I would use them to mark where I planted my bulbs so I could figure out which ones did not grow. My neighbor remarked the other day that my plants seemed to be sprouting early. I chuckled and told her that those were straws marking my plant bulbs.


Next, I started saving the paper bags. I would put them in my recycling bin. Afterwards, the plastic forks and knives started looking pretty good. I would rewash them and reuse them, and subsequently, I would never have to buy plastic utensils again. When you come to my house, as a guest, you will hear me say, “please do not throw out the plastic. I rewash them.” My party utensil holder reflects the new chic green colors of beige and white rather than the uniform color of all white utensils. Perhaps I will start a trend?


What about the napkins? Ever notice how many napkins you get in your bag? Enough to wipe your face ten times! I keep those too now in a drawer rather than throw them away with my meal. Dinner time now has an international theme of all the different shaped napkins and colors.


Last year, I was thinking of saving the foil that goes around the hamburger and chicken sandwiches to put around the base of my tomatoes. Aphids hide on the underside of your plants. They don’t like light. The aluminum foil will reflect the light upward so they would leave. Has anyone tried this trick?


The worse offender has to be the plastic containers. I am a salad eater. You always get a plastic bowl and plastic top. Obviously, you could save them and reuse them for leftover foods, except all the new reports are scaring me to death about using plastic to store my food. Instead of figuring out if this plastic is okay, in my hurry I was just throwing it out.


Since I have been gardening, I started looking at the plastic containers in a new light. How can I reuse those containers? First, I started cutting out the tops to use around my plants to supposedly stop cut worms from harming my plants. I thought it would stop the white moths from laying their eggs all over my broccoli. Well, the moths laughed at my funny idea, and sprinkled anyways.


I was planting my seeds and I noticed how well they germinated with the plastic cover on. My own little greenhouse! Once the seedlings sprouted I would take the cover off.


I only have one large seedling tray. When I tried to grow more seedlings and cover the tray part way, the seeds did not germinate as quickly. I could not create the same effect with a partially covered tray.


The other day, the Thomas Edison light bulb came on. I looked at my plastic salad bowls that I had been saving and thought, instant terrarium! The bowls were shallow and my seedlings holders could easily fit in there. Plus, I could put in a little water too to create my 7th grade science project. I was very excited. (It does not take much…)


The leftover Chinese containers work great too. The added benefit is they are small enough to fit on a window sill.


So, how is my little science project going? My lettuce has started sprouting. I am still waiting for my snap dragons to sprout as well.


So, how have you reused your fast food containers? Any suggestions on the chicken nugget containers? Via Green Talk

Meat is Methane or is it CO2

The Dot Earth blog over at the New York Times has a post about in vitro meat conference. Given the carbon footprint of raising meat, can the planet survive a world of McDonalds everywhere? Well probably not if we use animals, but how about it we manufactured it in test tubes. Hmmmm. It reminds me of a scene for cyberpunk prophet William Gibson who talked about vat grown meat in one scene.


I fluctuate between vegetarianism and regular meat consumption. Soy products have become very good, and it is possible to create healthy yummy cuisine sans animal protein. There is a veggie chinese place nearby that does a fantastic job simulating meat, though that's not the point.


I am at work on some pieces that reconceptualize status, meat is something that is aspired in many parts of the world, just as cars and TVs are as well. Can we think of other types of status that have smaller carbon footprints. Via Car Free in California

30,000 people at the Seattle Green Festival

Seattle_green_festival2

This place is packed! We just stood in line for twenty minutes to get an organic, meatless burrito. In fact, none of the food vendors will serve you meat. There is a sausage stand, but I think they're made of tofu.


I overheard one of the volunteers say that there were 30,000 people here today. Via Brave New Leaf

A Green Desktop Computer: The HP rp5700

image

Last summer, the HP rp5700 was welcomed with plenty of Green fanfare. At the time it was the first desktop computer to achieve the Electronic Products Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) Gold rating. Since then a number of other desktops have stepped up to achieve this rating, however, the rp5700 still holds the highest score (20 out of 24).


Unlike many other computers that are purposely made with short life spans (Planned Obsolescence) the HP rp5700 has an expected life of at least 5 years. 90% of the materials used to make the rp5700 are recyclable. It is easily disassembled and meets the EU’s strict RoHS compliance standards. Plus, 25% of the packaging materials come from recycled material, and 90% of it is recyclable and clearly labeled. All this means less junk for our landfills!


During the years that you’ll be rocking the rp5700 you can rest easy knowing that you will be wasting far less energy than you would with a lesser model. The rp5700 has been found to reduce power consumption by as much as 80% over conventional PC use making more than qualified for it’s Energy Star 4.0 compliance cert.


On top of leaving your conscience clean this bad boy should satisfy your performance hungry side with available Intel Core2 Duo 2.13 GHz, 4 GB DDR2 RAM, 250 GB SATA Hard Drive and much more! Via Green Upgrader

How To Make Your International Shipping Greener

For most people, shipping something quickly internationally boils down to a small bowl of alphabet soup: DHL, UPS, or FedEx. End of story. It’s just how things get done. But for an increasing number of people, they’re aware of the fact that airplane flight plays a major part in contributing to global climate change. But most only know part of the story.


Ship Greener

In a conversation with Justin Brown of First Global Xpress, I began to find out: All the major international shippers use a “hub and spoke” system to distribute packages. In a case of bureaucracy overriding logic, a package sent from New York to Europe may first go to New Jersey, then go several miles in the wrong direction, to Memphis Tennessee, then back overseas, taking in the sights at several major and regional sorting centers until it arrives. Why? It defies logic, in terms of efficiency, ecology, and economy.


And get this: according to Justin, 30% of jet fuel consumed is during take off. So, add up those extraneous miles, plus the fuel consumed each flight, and you’ve got an enormous carbon footprint here, an unnecessary one.


What to do? Enter First Global Xpress. What’s different about them? First off, they fly direct to the intended destination via the cargo space on a commercial airliner, of which they have reserved space on 95 airlines, and growing. In most cases, multiple flights a day are available to take your package. And generally speaking, your package will get there 24 hours earlier and 20% cheaper then the big boys.


Shipping that’s both more sustainable and affordable, how about that? But that’s not enough for Justin. He is of a new wave of green entrepreneurs that see a way to integrate their emerging green personal values with their business values, for the benefit of all.


Though he could easily say that his company is green, as compared to others, he wisely has chosen to forge on, examining how First Global Xpress can do even better. And even then, he prefers to refer to the company as shipping greener, not green. He knows that overseas expedited shipping will never be totally green, and even encourages clients to seek local options where possible, rather then ship. A sign of a businessman who sees the bigger picture, to be sure.


And Justin has chosen to be very transparent about the process, through the newly launched blog, shipgreener.com Shedding light on the industry, showing their experiments, the successes, the goofs, the whole thing, this is no perfect shiny self promotional wank. Knowing that people don’t want to hear about shipping all day long, he’s got plans to take you along on his NYC bicycle commute, talk to other business people venturing into the green waters, and more.


What else is in store then as far as greener international shipping at First Global Xpress? From how they package their packages to how they get them there on the ground, they will be improving and overhauling how they do what they do. (Details here) In fact, they’ve set the ambitious goal of reducing their overall carbon footprint by 66% by the end of the year. Will they do it? Who knows, but kudos to them for setting such an ambitious goal. Talking to Justin, I can tell you it’s not just hot air. Watch them do it. Better yet, make them your international shipper.
Via Ecopreneurist

Google Goes Green with New Clean Energy Website

Google announced in December that it planned to launch an ambitious renewable energy initiative. The recently created REGoogle’s digital mountain, but is well worth the time it takes to dig out. It provides a succinct outline of Google’s initiative, which has already invested heavily in breakthrough wind and solar energy technologies.


Here’s a brief synopsis of RE

“Clean and affordable energy is a growing need for our company, so we’re excited about launching RE


“We’re busy assembling our own internal research and development group and hiring a team of engineers and energy experts tasked with building 1 gigawatt of renewable energy capacity that is cheaper than coal. (That’s enough electricity to power a city the size of San Francisco.) Google’s R&D effort will begin with a significant effort on solar thermal technology, and will also investigate enhanced geothermal systems and other areas.


“In conjunction with the RE Google.org is already working with two innovative corporations who are building potentially breakthrough technologies, and we look forward to collaborating with other members of the renewable energy field, including companies, R&D laboratories, and universities.”


Check out Google’s Site


Via Clean Beta

Al Gore’s TED 2008 speech on the climate crisis

Al Gore who was once Vice President of the United States is more well known these days for his work promoting "The Inconvenient Truth" a great movie he and a talented group of people put together to highlight the problems we are having with the environment. He shows amazing passion and personality in all his presentations including the one I hope to share with you. This was recorded at the TED 2008 conference in Monterey, California and I really enjoyed it.

Solar Panels, Good for realstate?

With the value of real estate plunging, homes with solar panels installed are at a distinct advantage. They’re becoming a valuable selling point for potential homebuyers, who look to the future before buying, taking a home’s long-term energy use into consideration.


Electricity costs show no signs of going down. Solar systems are known to offset an average of 15 percent of electrical usage, depending on the size of a home. This can potentially cut large utility bills by hundreds of dollars each month. For first-time homebuyers especially, this means high mortgage costs can be less of a burden.


Solar panels themselves are versatile, benefiting even the more privileged buyer. The panels can be installed on the $200,000 home as well as the multi-million dollar property. They’re a popular investment for an increasingly enviro-conscious community, regardless of income. Though they’re often installed by owners who have the initial capital available, the investment is viewed as a worthy inheritance, especially since they have a lifespan of decades.


In addition, homes with solar panels installed typically have additional green features built in. This can range from passive solar floors and walls to energy tracking devices to water efficient fixtures. Developers of new homes are catching on, taking advantage of bulk prices to install solar panels on entire tracts. As global warming patterns continue and the environment remains on the forefront of every discerning homeowner’s conscious, homes without green building properties may become a thing of the past. And homes without solar panels will an exception rather than the norm. Via Celsias

It Pays To Recycle!

Isn’t it amazing to think that your old ‘stuff’ can do a lot of good in the world? And sometimes there’s a great incentive for you to put that old stuff to work? As you know, I’ve been clearing out the clutter and I’ve been building piles of stuff to take out of our place and redistribute.

I’m most happy to report that my freezer has found a new home. It now belongs to a family with four children. I know they’ll make great use of it so it’s a win/win for everyone – me, them and the environment as it’s not in a landfill somewhere.
I’ve gotten to thinking about where my stuff will end up – and I realized that much of it will benefit me twice. Once by freeing up space in my home and again by giving back to me on it’s way out. Read on and discover how your ‘stuff’ can do great things in its own way.

Our local grocery store gives us points for returning certain items for recycling – milk jugs, different product containers, empty inkjet cartridges and so on. I’ve accumulated many things and eventually those points add up to certificates I’m cashing in for my son’s RESP. Free money!

Here we pay deposits on many items – returning them gives you back money in your pocket. My family saves all of the bottles, cans etc. with deposits and once again, the money goes to our son. I know so many people that throw away these or toss them in the recycling bin. A terrible waste of their money!

You can take items to resale/consignment shops, sell them on ebay, craigslist, your local buy and sell paper and more. You can sell nearly anything, but clothing, household items, collectibles, furniture, kid’s clothes and toys and even electronics go quickly. And remember a garage or yard sale can sell just about anything. In many areas Kid’s Swaps are sweeping the regions. These are the best places to buy your baby and kids items at incredible prices. Why buy new? And you can sell it all again when you’re done!

There are locations that will take back wood, batteries, electronics, metal, old paint and more for recycling. In most cases you don’t get anything for it – and in some you may pay a small fee – but the reward comes in the environmental savings.

Used book stores and music stores are great places. You often don’t get cash, but with the credit you can get partial to full credit to spend on new to you things. I love my local used book store – (Sue’s Bookshelf). It’s a fabulous store with an every changing stock to browse in.

If you are not looking to make money – but want to do the right thing (and really, deep down inside, who doesn’t) don’t forget that taking a few minutes to take things to thrift stores, church clothing drives, shelters (both for people and animals) and toy depots can help to raise money to change a life – or to give things to someone who really needs it.

I was driving in North Delta, BC today and they are in the middle of a recycle week. You put all your stuff curbside and people take what they want. The rest goes to the dump. It’s a great idea, but I did see a lot of great things going into the big garbage trucks. Maybe next year they can encourage people to post the good stuff online so that other people can connect with the things they need, ensuring that it gets reused and not compacted. However, even as it is now, it’s still a fabulous idea and I’m sure it saves a lot of things from an early end to their useful lifecycle.

So before you toss something, think about whether it has value – to you, to someone else, to a recycle depot. If not – then think about whether or not it’s harmful to the environment. If so, is there a way to dispose of it better? I think I’ve found a place to recycle alkaline batteries for a few cents a pound. I’ve been saving mine in a baggie and will return them when I have more. Consider doing one small thing like this because when we all do it, it adds up to one really big thing! Via A year of Living Greener

Offset Your Second Life

4offsets.com just announced that they will start carbon offsetting your Second Life. I am think I might be the last person that is not a member of second life but 20 million people are members. Their combined carbon foot print is HUGE.


4offsets.com has made a deal with Jorel Ventures to open the Second Life Carbon Offset Exchange in Vio sim. The price is 400 Linden, around a dollar or two, for you to offset your second life carbon footprint for a year.


There are also plans to have lectures in second life about global warming too.


If anyone is involved in second life I would love to hear more about the store and how it works.

Via CND

Green Your Work

51sy7xzxgl_aa262_.jpg

Today’s tip is from National Public Health Week - Climate Change: Our Health in the Balance.


The NPHW website urges us to make greener choices at work.

  • Don’t print out what you can read on the screen.
  • Don’t send a fax when you can send an e-mail.
  • Consider adding a line to your e-mails asking people not to print them out.
  • Make a case for recycled paper and see if you can get your company to make the switch.
  • Power down your computer when it isn’t in use.
  • Unplug the coffee maker when it’s done being used for the day.
Via Allies Answers

Climate Change and our health

Oddly enough, it seems the forgotten dialogue about climate change is the impact on human health. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Public Health Association (APHA) are raising awareness. In fact, WHO dedicated its annual World Health Day last Monday to the connection between diseases like malaria and global warming, strengthening the moral case to be made for reducing carbon emissions. Dr. Jonathan Patz, a professor of environmental studies and population health sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in Time: ““When we think about climate change, we think about ice caps and biodiversity, but we forget about human health. There are a huge number of health outcomes that are climate sensitive.” MORE.

Via Down to Earth

First LEED Certified Parking Structure Generates Most Its Own Power

Santa Clara Civic Center Parking Lot

I realize that by blogging about this, I'm risking some criticism as to whether a parking structure can be green. I think it can, but I've heard mention from others that the term "green parking lot" is an oxymoron of sorts. After giving it some thought, I just can't imagine a world, or a city for that matter, with absolutely no parking lot. They're going to exist, so they might as well be super green and zero energy, to the extent possible. This building, which is the Santa Monica Civic Center parking structure, has a solar array that provides all the building's energy needs.


But it's not just energy efficient, it's green, too.


Other sustainable features include a storm drain water treatment system, recycled construction materials and waste, low-VOC paints and coatings, low-e glazing for heating and cooling efficiency, and energy efficient mechanical systems.


Designed by Moore Ruble Yudell Architects and Planners, the structure is on track to be the first LEED Certified parking structure in the USA. In total, it provides 900 spaces spread through six levels of above grade parking and one and a half levels of below grade parking. Perhaps the most interesting feature of the building, however, is the fact that it doesn't look like a parking lot -- a feature fit for the civic center.


Also, the distinctive use of laminated glass panels won the firm a design award from The Glass Association of North America, which is a pretty cool accolade to add certification. Via Jetsongreen

Ethanol from Cheese?

whey-ethanol-machine.jpg

There’s always a better whey.



A Wisconsin cheese producer, Joe Van Groll of Stratford, Wisconsin, has a way with whey.


For nearly a decade, Van Groll experimented using the waste product of cheese manufacturing, whey permeate, to manufacture ethanol. During the past four years, he’s been doing just that, and believes his process can produce ethanol for less than $1 a gallon.


In an effort to avoid waste and simplify things, Van Groll’s process:


1. Turns whey permeate into ethanol.

2. Separates and dries the yeast coproduct for feed.

3. Utilizes the heat produced from fermentation and distillation to make biodiesel.

4. Waste heat, water and carbon dioxide can be used to raise oil-bearing algae for biodiesel.

5. Incorporate an anaerobic digester that turns wastes into methane to power the process.


10 billion pounds of cheese are produced in the United States every year and that results in 86 billion pounds of whey permeate. Much of the waste is spread onto farmers’ fields at the cheese makers expense, but that is limited and environmental regulators are beginning to restrict the process.


The other option is to dispose of the waste in municipal water treatment facilities, but because of its high biological oxygen demand, pretreatment is required.


Van Groll says, “My process takes a cost center and turns it into a profit center.”


Will his process make it to your fuel tank? Several entrepreneurs and a few countries have shown an interest in the process. Via Gas 2.0

Plastic Bags Could Store Excess Wind Energy In The Ocean

wind turbines

Seamus Garvey, a UK professor at the Nottingham University, thinks he has a better idea of storing wind energy…by storing it in flexible plastic containers on the ocean floor.


Surplus wind energy is currently stored in huge underground tanks via a technique called “Compressed Air Energy Storage” (CAES). During peak energy hours, air is released to power the wind turbine to produce the needed electricity. Unfortunately, there are currently only 2 CAES sites in the world, McIntosh, Alabama and Huntorf, Germany.


Two years ago, using the same idea but different technique, Professor Garvey started researching an alternative way to storing wind energy. He discovered that by using a wind turbine or wave-powered device, that he could compress the air. “Drawing a mass down within the blade of the piston itself compresses the air,” he said.


At a depth of approximately 600 meters, the Professor calculates that plastic bags in the form of polyester reinforcement and polythene, would be able to store 25 megajoules of energy for each meter cubed and might just be a more efficient way to storing excess wind energy. Via Got2begreen

The Climate Project, Sierra Club Launch India Chapters

TCP-India launchLed by Nobel laureate Al Gore, The Climate Project (TCP) – a US based non-profit organization — took the lead on March 15th, 2008 in launching its India chapter by training over a hundred enthusiastic representatives of business, politics and civic society. Dr. R.K. Pachauri, chairman of the Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the other half of the Nobel Peace Prize 2007 was also present at this Climate Change leadership Program.


Declaring the emerging economy of India to be the future of the world, Mr. Gore asked for greater participation by all Indians in the efforts to combat climate change and secure a safer tomorrow. He also called for raising global consciousness to a higher level to address several of the so-called political challenges being faced in different parts of the world today. Developing the capacity for a vision and building a moral authority are essential to taking action together as a civilization. According to Mr. Gore, is the need of the hour.


The presence of the dual climate crusaders - Al Gore and Dr. R.K. Pachauri throughout the training Program left a lasting impression on many, including myself.


The Climate Project - India (TCP-India) is being setup as an independent organization. It presently enjoys deep support from the JSW Foundation and is actively seeking support from a broad base of Indian Business and Philanthropic organizations.


Barely a month later on April 3rd 2008, the Sierra Club, the oldest and largest grassroots environmental organization in the U.S. announced the establishing of a Center for Green Livelihoods in India for partnering with civil society organizations to explore ways of creating a robust dialogue towards developing a green economy. Mr. Carl Pope, Executive Director of the Sierra Club also announced a new $100,000 “Green Energy and Green Livelihoods Achievement Award” to recognize “outstanding environmental success in India” by civil society organizations – non-governmental organizations, cooperatives, small businesses and labor unions working at the grassroots level in India.


Stephen Mills, Director, International Programs at Sierra Club, who was also a facilitator at the TCP/Al Gore Climate Change leadership Program mentioned above, had emphasized the need to encourage the green work being done in India during the leadership program itself. In a press release announcing the launch of the Sierra Club’s India chapter, he clarified that the new India initiative will in no way lessen the vigor of the Sierra Club’s U.S. campaigning to push both the American public and the government to drastically reduce America’s over consumption of natural resources,” Via EcoWordly

China Plans to Control Weather During the Olympics

To prevent rain over the roofless 91,000-seat Olympic stadium that Beijing natives have nicknamed the Bird’s Nest, the city’s branch of the national Weather Modification Office–itself a department of the larger China Meteorological Administration–has prepared a three-stage program for the 2008 Olympics this August.


First, Beijing’s Weather Modification Office will track the region’s weather via satellites, planes, radar, and an IBM p575 supercomputer, purchased from Big Blue last year, that executes 9.8 trillion floating point operations per second. It models an area of 44,000 square kilometers (17,000 square miles) accurately enough to generate hourly forecasts for each kilometer.


Then, using their two aircraft and an array of twenty artillery and rocket-launch sites around Beijing, the city’s weather engineers will shoot and spray silver iodide and dry ice into incoming clouds that are still far enough away that their rain can be flushed out before they reach the stadium.


Finally, any rain-heavy clouds that near the Bird’s Nest will be seeded with chemicals to shrink droplets so that rain won’t fall until those clouds have passed over. Zhang Qian, head of Beijing’s Weather Modification Office, explains, “We use a coolant made from liquid nitrogen to increase the number of droplets while decreasing their average size. As a result, the smaller droplets are less likely to fall, and precipitation can be reduced.” August is part of Northeast Asia’s rainy season; chances of precipitation over Beijing on any day that month will approach 50 percent. Still, while tests with clouds bearing heavy rain loads haven’t always been successful, Qian claims that “the results with light rain have been satisfactory.”


China’s national weather-engineering program is also the world’s largest, with approximately 1,500 weather modification professionals directing 30 aircraft and their crews, as well as 37,000 part-time workers–mostly peasant farmers–who are on call to blast away at clouds with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers.

Via Groovygreen

Google Shows Off Plug-in Electric Car Data

Google’s been tracking its plug-in electric vehicle project for a couple months now, and has started compiling some of that data on its website. While they don’t have any conclusions yet as to whether or not plug-in Priuses are substantially better than Priuses (patience folks), they have started updating colorful charts recording the details of driving and charging each of the two Priuses and the three plug-in Priuses.

Googs also gave some more details of how its tracking system works, which, yes, we’re a little enthusiastic about. Google says it’s using an embedded Linux computer in each vehicle made by Soekris Engineering. The cars also use an ammeter to measure how much power the car is sucking from the grid when plugged in, and a GPS to record the car’s position and more importantly time for the web logs.


I’ve got two questions. Google is doing this because they are interested in the technology, but have other companies done this research before? And also, hey Google why’d you guys only drive “Machu Picchu” (one of the get-away-vacation-named plug-in Priuses) once over the past few months?
Via earth2tech

Food Labeling

Many of the food products are labeled as organic, vegan, natural, etc., but what do they really mean; is there a certification of their claim?

Label

Where?

What it means?

Is it verified?

Is it meaningful?

Certified Organic

Meat, fruits, vegetables, grains, diary.

Free of pesticides and fertilizers, and all antibiotics, genetic engineering, irradiation and sewage sludge. Organic animals must eat 100% organic feed and must have access to the outdoors.

Yes, it is regulated by USDA.

Yes. 95% of the ingredients must be organically grown and the remaining 5% must come from non-organic ingredients that have been approved on the National List. These products display the USDA organic logo and/or the certifier’s logo.

100% Organic

Meat, fruits, vegetables, grains, diary.

All ingredients are 100% free of pesticides, fertilizers, antibiotics, genetic engineering, irradiation and sewage sludge.

Yes, it is regulated by USDA.

Yes. 100% of the ingredients must be organically grown. These products display the USDA organic logo and/or the certifier’s logo.

Made with Organic Ingredients

Meat, fruits, vegetables, grains, diary.

Contains at least 70% organic ingredients, three of which must be listed on the back of the package and again, the remaining 30% of the non-organic ingredients must approved on the National List.

Yes, it is regulated by USDA.

Yes.

Certified Vegan

Snacks, candies, condiments, frozen food, soups, soy products, cookies, cakes, nuts, grains, veggie burger, beverages.

Contain no animal ingredients or by-products, use no animal ingredients or by-products in the manufacturing process, and not tested on animals by any company or independent contractor.

Yes, the Vegan Awareness Foundation.

Yes. These products should have the logo of the Vegan Awareness Foundation.

Fair Trade Certified

Chocolate bars, bananas, grapes, pineapples, mangoes, sugar, rice, cocoa powder, tea, coffee

Ensure that farmers in developing nations receive a fair price for their product; have direct trade relations with buyers and access to credit; and encourage sustainable farming methods, without the use of a dozen of the most harmful pesticides, and forced child labor. The buyer must also be willing to pay up to 60% of the purchase in advance for some products, including coffee, tea and cocoa.

Yes, TransFair USA (the only certifier of Fair Trade goods in the U.S.), a member of Fair Trade Labelling Organizations International (FLO).

Yes.

Fresh Poultry

Chicken.

Any raw poultry product should not be cooled below 24 degrees Fahrenheit.

Yes, it is regulated by USDA.

Somewhat. It is not clear for how long the product can be stored in the freezer.

100% Vegan

Bread, candy, cereals, baby food, soups, condiments, processed food, snacks, beverages.

Does not contain any animal-derived ingredients.

No.

No.

100% Vegetarian Ingredients

Processed food, condiments.

Avoids animal products for food.

No.

No.

Antibiotic Free

Meat (lamb, beef, chicken, pork) and diary products (eggs, milk, cheese, yogurt, cream).

No antibiotics were used in the production of a food product.

No.

No. The USDA has banned the use of the term "antibiotic free" but allowed the use the claims "no antibiotics administered" or "raised without antibiotics."

Hormone free

Meat (lamb, beef, chicken, pork) and diary products (eggs, milk, cheese, yogurt, cream).

No hormones were used in the production of a food product.

No.

No. The USDA has banned the use of the term "hormone free". The USDA has banned the use of hormones on pork and poultry.

Natural and All Natural

Meat (poultry, beef, chicken, pork), cookies, candies, diary products (cheese, cream), processed food, frozen food, beverages, snacks.

No standard definition; the only exception is applied to meat and poultry products - defined by USDA as “not containing any artificial flavoring, colors, chemical preservatives, or synthetic ingredients”

No.

Somewhat. It is not regulated therefore, is up to the manufacturer.

Free Range

Eggs, chicken and other meat labels as free-range

Suggests that an animal has spent a good part of its life outdoors.

No.

No. The time spent outdoor is not regulated. It can be as less as 5 minutes regardless the animals went outside or not.

Cage Free

Eggs, chicken.

Suggest a high quality of life for hens

No.

No.

  • Always look for the certification of the claimed label. If there is no certification associated with the label there is no assurance that the product is actually what is claiming to be.
  • For products having a label that is not regulated, look for ingredients. It is possible to find ingredients that are contradicting the claim (e.g., for 100% Vegan)
Via A Bunch of Greens

Senate Coalition Introduces Clean Energy Tax Package

As was reported at Hill Heat, and elsewhere, Senators John Ensign (R-NV) and Maria Cantwell (D-WA), led a bipartisan group of senators in announcing a bill to incentivize the development of renewable energy and expand energy efficiency in buildings, homes, and appliances. The Clean Energy Tax Stimulus Package of 2008 (pdf) will provide some certainty to investors and those individuals and businesses that are considering adding solar, wind, biomass, methane capture, or other clean energy technologies.


Teetering on the brink of passage



Renewable Energy tax packages always face trouble in the Senate, and this dates back to our first energy crises in the 1970s. In a more recent example, a tax package failed repeatedly on the Senate floor, including a $22 billion version that fell one vote short of winning approval as an amendment to a broader energy bill in December. Many Republicans balked at the funding mechanism for the previous renewable energy incentives because they rescinded tax breaks from the big energy companies (which was spun by the right as a “tax increase.”).

Summary of the bill:



  • The renewable energy production tax credit (PTC) is extended one year to 2009 and modified to include tidal power
  • The solar and fuel cell investment tax credit (ITC) is extended 8 years to 2016
  • The residential energy-efficient property credit is extended one year to 2009, and the $2,000 cap is removed
  • Clean Renewable Energy Bonds (CREBs) are extended one year to 2009, with an additional $400 million authorized
  • The 10% ITC for energy-efficiency improvements to existing homes is extended one year to 2009
  • The contractor tax credit for energy-efficient new homes is extended two years to 2010
  • The energy-efficient commercial buildings deduction is extended one year to 2009 and increases the $1.80/sqft max to $2.25/sqft
  • The energy-efficient appliance credit is extended to 2010
Via CleanTechnia

Green Building For Dummies

greenbuildingfordummies.jpg

The book Green Building & Remodeling for Dummies was recently sent to me for review. I was curious to see the "Dummies" take on this subject, because there are few books on green building aimed at the layperson. The book was penned by Eric Corey Freed of Organic Architect. We have featured Freed previously on TreeHugger. He manages a comprehensive survey of green building techniques in the book's 361 pages. You can read some sample chapters.


I enjoyed the conceptualization and illustration of the "Perfect Green Kitchen" and the "Perfect Green Bedroom".


I also found the life cycle analysis of different building materials (such as glass and brick) quite illuminating. In fact, I'd like to see whole book devoted to life cycle analyses.


Another highlight at the end of the book was the last chapter: "Ten Green Things You Can Do in Your Home Right Now".

Via Tree Hugger

Wind Power Breaks Records in Spain

“Wind power is breaking new records in Spain, accounting for just over 40 percent of all electricity consumed during a brief period last weekend, the country’s wind power association said Tuesday. As heavy winds lashed Spain on Saturday evening wind parks generated 9,862 megawatts of power which translated to 40.8 percent of total consumption due to low demand during the Easter holiday weekend, AEE said. Between Friday and Sunday wind power accounted for an average of 28 percent of all electricity demand in Spain, which is a leading world producer of such energy, a statement from the association said. The record for power generated by Spain’s wind parks was set on March 4 at 10,032 megawatts, but as it was a regular working day this accounted for less percentage demand.”

Water Heaters Get Energy Star Status and Reduce Bills, Emissions

GE hybrid electric water heater tank
They’re not sexy, but the Department of Energy estimates 13% of your home energy consumption goes into big tank of hot water. I’ve seen other estimates that go higher, and a larger or older tank will burn more energy. So your water heater may be one of the more boring appliances in your home, but it’s a leading load on your energy bill. Fortunately, there are easy ways to fix that.


First let’s talk about how to improve a water heater that you already have. For less than $20, you can hit your local DIY hub/ home improvement store and buy a water heater blanket with quick and easy assembly instructions. If Internet testimonials are true, it will probably take more time to drive to the store and buy one, than it will to install it. If your water heater already has a blanket, bravo! Just keep in mind that the big sticker on the front of your water heater has some important information. You might want to tape it to the blanket for easy reference. While you’re at it, you could also consider insulating some of your pipes or ducts (see first link in this paragraph) for even more savings.


If you’re renovating your house, or if you water heater recently died, consider an upgrade. The D.O.E. just posted new Energy Star ratings for water heaters, so read the stats on a new tank to get the best value. If you want to join millions of people in other countries, you could consider getting a tankless water heater. Instead of heating a large volume of water and storing it, a tankless water heater works on demand, heating water as it’s used. They generally use 10% to 20% less energy than a standard 40 gallon tank heater, and they come in both electric and natural gas varieties.


I had one while I was living in South Korea and loved it. The water was hotter than I needed, and it never ran out, not even when I had company.


If you’re ready for a new water heater but you also have all the hook-ups for a tank, fear not. General Electric is capitalizing on infrastructure built into most homes to replace old water heater tanks with their upcoming hybrid-electric water heater tank. Yes that’s right, it’s the hybrid of water heaters. GE claims this electric water heater tank will use less than half of the energy a standard one requires. And even more cool, it absorbs heat from the air and transfers it into the water. Forgive me, but that tickles every nerdy bone in my body! The electric water heater tank will be available in 2009, and EcoGeek claims the energy savings could have huge implications.


Also, let’s not forget solar-thermal water heaters. As investing in solar energy goes, this will return your investment fastest. Better yet, it’s a renewable source.


So are water heaters sexy? Maybe if they’re tankless, but generally not. However, that doesn’t mean you can’t save some money by increasing your home’s energy efficiency. In fact, many groups suggest that increasing the energy efficiency of existing buildings is the cheapest and easiest way to combat climate change right now. It’s something most people can do to take action with minimal investment or effort. So take a look at your water heater and see what you can do. Once our water’s energy use is efficient, maybe we can move on to making our use of water more efficient too. Via Clean Technia

The technologies that will save the planet

This is going to be technology week on Climate Progress. I will be describing the technologies that the nation and the world will use to avoid catastrophic warming, and discussing things like commercialization and deployment.


I will also present the “silver bullet” technology that will probably be the single biggest contributor to replacing coal by 2050 — when exactly I post will be contingent on when Salon runs my long piece on this technology.


I will lay out all of the “stabilization wedges” that I think the world will be employing. And I’ll even try to lay out a scenario for how I think the politics may play out to make this all happen.


Strangely, the more I have thought about this in the last week, the more optimistic I have become — which is the opposite of how thinking about most things climate related usually affect me. I think the world can stay below 450 ppm, if we want to, while sustaining development — and, of course, without any technology breakthroughs. Indeed, to echo Ken’s Apollo 13 metaphor, we are going to have to save ourselves with the technologies we have now (which includes what will be commercial by, say, 2020).

Via Climate Progress

Al Gore captivates Montreal

Al Gore strode into Montreal Friday evening and the city embraced him as one of its own. In fact, I can’t quite imagine that he gets quite this kind of welcome anywhere else.


First of all, his visit was sponsored by La Presse, which guaranteed a pretty compelling advance. And if the front page coverage wasn’t impressive enough, the full-colour special section on climate change would have to turn your head.


Before taking to the stage at the Place des Arts to deliver his now-famous slideshow, Gore was whisked off to the offices of Power Corporation – a name which perfectly describes the scope, if not the actual activities of the company in question – for a VIP reception hosted by Power Corp co-chair Paul Desmarais Jr. and including the cream of the Montreal business and political community. Premier Jean Charest, Opposition leader Mario Dumont, Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe, former Quebec Premier Lucien Bouchard, Montreal Mayor Gerald Tremblay and a host of other cabinet ministers and lesser dignitaries. (It only made me wonder: where was Stephane Dion?)


Once Gore took to the stage, it quickly became clear why the denier community hates him so fervently. The man can work a room – even a room stuffed with almost 1,500 people. He delivered the now-famous Inconvenient Truth presentation pretty much as he did in the Academy Award-winning movie version, hitting all the bases, telling all the jokes. He even found time to work in the self-deprecating reference to the day’s unseasonal snowfall, saying, “The weather today was completely refusing to cooperate with my message.”


There were a few differences in the program. The slides were all in French, and a few were slightly modified for Canadian content. And he pitched some of his comments more directly to the Canadian audience. He said, for example, that “What we decide to do in this decade will affect the whole course of human history,” and at such a time “the world looks to Canada.”


He said that Quebec has such an influence in Canada, that Canada has such influence in North America and that North America has such influence in the world that that action those in the audience had a responsibility to act and a real hope that their actions would be worthwhile.


A final difference, in this presentation, was the passion – perhaps even anger and frustration – that he brought to the delivery. Although he pretty carefully avoided commenting on the current U.S. administration – “with which I fear I am losing my objectivity” – he seemed more obviously emotional than he was in the film or than he has been in the presentations attended by others in this audience.


He certainly touched a chord. The standing ovation was quick, convincing and prolonged.


So, it turns out that finding Al Gore was not really that difficult: in Montreal, at least, you just have to follow the applause. Via Desmogblog

Greenpeace Maps Forest Data in Google Earth

We’re such big fans of Google’s mapping services that we’ve been been racking up a list of our own creations: 101 Cleantech Startups, Coal Plant Deathwatch and E2T’s Eco Tour. Turns out Greenpeace is a bit of a Google Earth groupie too, and this week the non profit org announced its own section in Google Earth’s Global Awareness layer.


“Layers” are data points overlaid on Google Earth’s 3-D world map, and Google, through its “Outreach” program, has been encouraging nonprofits to create their own maps for its Global Awareness Section. Ah, you do-gooder, Google.


Greenpeace launched the layer in Hamburg, Germany, yesterday, and the data shows how deforestation is adding to climate change. We checked it out and the data includes such things as a German conference on biodiversity and data on protecting the remaining 60 million hectares of rainforests of the Democratic Republic of Congo. The points were a little scarce, but Greenpeace says it will add more soon. It’s a good start.


googleearthgreenpeace.jpg

Via eart2tech

Insight on L.A. Parking Incentive

Yesterday I posted about the Los Angeles City Council repealing an ordinance giving hybrid drivers the right to park for free through 2011 just days after voting on it. Why? That kind of move is so frustrating. Here’s a little insight on the matter from the Daily News:

In this new version, only those vehicles with the stickers - which are no longer available - can park for free.And that’s what changed this from a marginally good idea to one that has no social benefit other than to reward a small subset of drivers.

Moreover, it’s in direct conflict with the original purpose of the free meters ordinance.

It can’t possibly encourage people to buy hybrids, since it only applies to cars that sport stickers that are no longer available. It’s a perk for a few people who already benefit by saving money in gas bills, restrictionless car-pool driving and bragging rights.

The outcry brought the issue back to the council this week for reconsideration, but the council members backed away from taking action and are simply “studying” the issue.

I was under the impression that it was pulled back because some people didn’t want any parking benefits, not that others wanted more.

Still, it doesn’t change my opinion very much, if at all. If the city was using free parking as an incentive, they should honor that for a reasonable amount of time.

I wonder what effect this will have on the policies in other cities? Is free parking an incentive to buy hybrids in other areas? And should we stop providing incentives because a small portion of the vehicles on the road have gone hybrid? Where’s the tipping point?

I disagree with the Daily News in that I don’t believe a study is useless. They may find the benefits for hybrid drivers are still justified by the impact on air quality, etc. Via Eco Firendly Driver

Graham Claims McCain Has Done ‘Even More’ Than Al Gore On Global Warming

Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC) said of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ):

“Climate change is the road less traveled but he’s traveled it even more than Al Gore,” Graham said. “Al Gore has talked about it and deserves great recognition but he was around here a long time and never introduced a bill.”

Let’s see. McCain got 43 votes the first time he pushed his bill with Lieberman. He added some nuclear subsidies for the second go-round and got 38 votes. So I’m not sure he can lay claim to great achievements.

The key point for me is that unlike Gore — and unlike Clinton and ObamaMcCain doesn’t support the policies needed to successfully address catastrophic climate change without devastating the economy (and without an absurd over-reliance on nuclear power):

Heck — McCain ramped down his talk about climate recently, even as Gore ramps up his communications effort. For the full statement by Graham, and a full rebuttal, see ThinkProgress, which has a great post that I’ll just reprint below :

An online ABC News article on the “surrogate wars” of this year’s presidential election quoted Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), an ardent supporter of Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) candidacy, saying that McCain has “earned a reputation…of doing things that put the country ahead of party.” As an example, Graham cited McCain’s environmental record, claiming that it’s stronger that former Vice President Al Gore’s:

“He’s not going to run away from President Bush but at the end of the day, John McCain has earned a reputation, and has the scars to show it, of doing things that put the country ahead of party,” Graham said, noting McCain has differed with the party on immigration, his desire to close Guantanamo Bay, and enacting robust climate change policies.

“Climate change is the road less traveled but he’s traveled it even more than Al Gore,” Graham said. “Al Gore has talked about it and deserves great recognition but he was around here a long time and never introduced a bill.”

On its face, Graham’s claim is laughable. But digging deeper into the substance, it rings of pure absurdity. In fact, Gore held the first congressional hearings on climate change in the late 1970s, well before McCain was even elected to Congress.

In 1997, Gore helped broker the Kyoto Protocol which called for nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Despite the passing of a Senate resolution stating that the U.S should not join Kyoto, Gore symbolically signed the protocol in November, 1998. While McCain voted for the resolution, he claims today that “we have an obligation” to cut greenhouse gases but still thinks the U.S. “did the right thing by not joining the Kyoto treaty.”

Moreover, the evidence shows that McCain is confused on environmental issues. He now supports ethanol despite previously criticizing it. McCain has talked tough on capping carbon emissions but failed to even vote on key Senate legislation addressing the issue. Furhermore, he doesn’t seem to understand his own position on cap-and-trade:

In the Republican debate in Florida, he denied that his cap-and-trade program included a mandatory cap on carbon. (One wonders what he thought that first word was doing in there.) He has said he won’t support a cap-and-trade bill unless it includes extra support for nuclear power (because nuclear power is low-carbon), not seeming to grok the fact that the whole point of a cap-and-trade program is to raise prices on carbon, offering a de facto subsidy to all low-carbon options.

While Gore was starring in the Oscar winning global warming documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” and being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his work on climate change, McCain has been trying to build an environmental record that is just strong enough to anger conservatives and fool the media into continuing to call him a “maverick.” But the reality is that McCain’s record falls well short of the leadership Gore has shown on the issue.
An online ABC News article on the “surrogate wars” of this year’s presidential election quoted Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), an ardent supporter of Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) candidacy, saying that McCain has “earned a reputation…of doing things that put the country ahead of party.” As an example, Graham cited McCain’s environmental record, claiming that it’s stronger that former Vice President Al Gore’s:

“He’s not going to run away from President Bush but at the end of the day, John McCain has earned a reputation, and has the scars to show it, of doing things that put the country ahead of party,” Graham said, noting McCain has differed with the party on immigration, his desire to close Guantanamo Bay, and enacting robust climate change policies.

“Climate change is the road less traveled but he’s traveled it even more than Al Gore,” Graham said. “Al Gore has talked about it and deserves great recognition but he was around here a long time and never introduced a bill.”

On its face, Graham’s claim is laughable. But digging deeper into the substance, it rings of pure absurdity. In fact, Gore held the first congressional hearings on climate change in the late 1970s, well before McCain was even elected to Congress.

In 1997, Gore helped broker the Kyoto Protocol which called for nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Despite the passing of a Senate resolution stating that the U.S should not join Kyoto, Gore symbolically signed the protocol in November, 1998. While McCain voted for the resolution, he claims today that “we have an obligation” to cut greenhouse gases but still thinks the U.S. “did the right thing by not joining the Kyoto treaty.”

Moreover, the evidence shows that McCain is confused on environmental issues. He now supports ethanol despite previously criticizing it. McCain has talked tough on capping carbon emissions but failed to even vote on key Senate legislation addressing the issue. Furhermore, he doesn’t seem to understand his own position on cap-and-trade:

In the Republican debate in Florida, he denied that his cap-and-trade program included a mandatory cap on carbon. (One wonders what he thought that first word was doing in there.) He has said he won’t support a cap-and-trade bill unless it includes extra support for nuclear power (because nuclear power is low-carbon), not seeming to grok the fact that the whole point of a cap-and-trade program is to raise prices on carbon, offering a de facto subsidy to all low-carbon options.

While Gore was starring in the Oscar winning global warming documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” and being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his work on climate change, McCain has been trying to build an environmental record that is just strong enough to anger conservatives and fool the media into continuing to call him a “maverick.” But the reality is that McCain’s record falls well short of the leadership Gore has shown on the issue. Via Climate Progress

Solar Panels and the Quest for $1/Watt- We’re there!

This is a good overview of the solar industry by Michelle Bennett of CleanTechnica.com. The article discusses Nanosolar’s thin solar cell technology, traditional polysilicon photovoltaics, AVASolar’s CdTe thin film technology, problems with ramping up production of new (and old) PV technology, and alternative clean energy techniques, including solar heating. The article doesn’t mention First Solar, who are in production with thin film, non-silicon based photovoltaics that are, I believe, also based on CdTe (I learned about First Solar from Steve B.). However, it is a nice summary of the solar panel, photovoltaic (or PV) industry. Ms. Bennett mentions that Nanosolar has beaten the $1/Watt goal according to the US Department of Energy (DOE), so their solar panels are officially generating electricity cheaper than coal.


The story does omit mention of the terrible environmental problems in China due to polycrystalline silicon production.


In Ms. Bennett’s article, the point is made that with oil falling out of favor, a potential opportunity for coal exists to compete with solar, etc. Luckily, as I’ve blogged about, some investment banks are refusing to fund coal-fired electricity plants. We need to make sure that our government plays its part in keeping coal from expanding (which is a realistic goal after the current administration is swept out). Coal plant emissions have already been ruled illegal in the US.* A great example is being set by Germany, for example, where solar and wind power are being pursued aggressively. Spain is also very active in solar power, and England is pursuing wind power with vigor.


Thanks to cmanders53 for DIGGing this article, which is how I came across it.


*On Friday, a US federal appeals court in Washington ruled that a policy by the Bush administration that exempted coal- and oil-fired power plants from regulations on emissions of mercury and other hazardous substances “was unlawful”. See the link above for more by Sam Carana on illegal coal emissions.


read more
Via Green Chemistry

Sun Activity not linked to Climate Change

Scientists have produced further compelling evidence showing that modern-day climate change is not caused by changes in the Sun's activity.

The research contradicts a favoured theory of climate "sceptics", that changes in cosmic rays coming to Earth determine cloudiness and temperature.


The idea is that variations in solar activity affect cosmic ray intensity.


But Lancaster University scientists found there has been no significant link between them in the last 20 years.


Presenting their findings in the Institute of Physics journal, Environmental Research Letters, the UK team explain that they used three different ways to search for a correlation, and found virtually none.


The IPCC has got it right, so we had better carry on trying to cut carbon emissions
Terry Sloan

This is the latest piece of evidence which at the very least puts the cosmic ray theory, developed by Danish scientist Henrik Svensmark at the Danish National Space Center (DNSC), under very heavy pressure.


Dr Svensmark's idea formed a centrepiece of the controversial documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle.


Wrong path


"We started on this game because of Svensmark's work," said Terry Sloan from Lancaster University.


Terry Sloan has simply failed to understand how cosmic rays work on clouds
Henrik Svensmark

"If he is right, then we are going down the wrong path of taking all these expensive measures to cut carbon emissions; if he is right, we could carry on with carbon emissions as normal."


Cosmic rays are deflected away from Earth by our planet's magnetic field, and by the solar wind - streams of electrically charged particles coming from the Sun.


The Svensmark hypothesis is that when the solar wind is weak, more cosmic rays penetrate to Earth.


That creates more charged particles in the atmosphere, which in turn induces more clouds to form, cooling the climate.


The planet warms up when the Sun's output is strong.


Professor Sloan's team investigated the link by looking for periods in time and for places on the Earth which had documented weak or strong cosmic ray arrivals, and seeing if that affected the cloudiness observed in those locations or at those times. Via BBC

Win $100,000 for Your Green Business

Green entrepreneur, Eric Hudson, brought home the grand prize in last year’s Forbes Magazine, Boost Your Business contest. His company, Recycline, Inc. makes environment-friendly toothbrushes, razors and tableware sold under the Preserve brand.

On 12/12, Recycline’s founder and president, Eric Hudson, went to New York City to accept the $100,000 prize from Forbes.com and Hewlett-Packard. While it was many months of pulling out all the stops, the contest was quite enjoyable for us, largely because so many folks rallied for us with votes and encouragement. We are very thankful for all the support we received from everyone who voted and asked their friends to vote. The grand prize will help us take on more environmental initiatives and introduce Preserve products to more and more people across the U.S.


This year, Forbes started accepting submissions for the $100,000 prize on April 2nd . Open to all entrepreneurs, with the high visibility of green business, eco entrepreneurs have an excellent chance of winning again.


“The second annual ‘Boost Your Business’ contest continues our tradition of celebrating small businesses and helping them grow,” said Brett Nelson, Forbes.com Entrepreneurs Editor. “Forbes.com is thrilled to offer entrepreneurs an opportunity to showcase their businesses and sell their ideas to a discerning audience of readers and investors.”


In the first round of the contest entrepreneurs submit a 500 word description of their business including a description of the business model and their plan for using the prize money to grow their business. Twenty semi finalists will make it to the second round and 5 finalists will present their detailed business plan to a panel of judges.


Initial entries must be received by May 31st and the contest ends in November. The grand prize winner will be honored at an awards ceremony in December. Via Ecopreneurist

Go Green, Live Rich by David Bach

David Bach has written a lot of books with titles like "Automatic Millionaire" and "Start Late Finish Rich" that appeal to many (he has sold millions of them) but I admit to never having had much interest in the genre. However, TreeHugger has always promoted living with less, using fewer resources and having a smaller footprint, and over on Planet Green we often talk of frugality as a green virtue. David Bach takes those ideas to the bank in Go Green, Live Rich.

It is a simple theory: do all the little things we prattle on about, like improving your car's fuel economy (save $884 per year); sealing the leaks in your home and save a little on energy ($129); turning back your thermostat ($85) and brownbaggging your lunch. ($1,560). Take that $3,758 and invest it. What have you got in 30 years? $ 678,146.


Suddenly the genre and going green looks very, very interesting.


Bach writes well, in a breezy style; it is an easy read. However by putting a dollar value on 50 different green steps that you can easily take, he changes the whole message about going green, from doing something good for the environment over time (a hard sell to all but the most dedicated TreeHuggers) to doing something good for yourself and your bank account. Self-interest is a great motivator, and if the result is a dramatically smaller footprint, everybody wins.


Bach notes in the introduction:


"My own personal transformation to becoming more environmentally conscious began to happen when I moved into one of the leading green apartment buildings in the country. Funny enough, I decided to move there not so much because it was a green building but because it was located right next to my son’s favorite park, where we spend lots of time together.


But then something happened when I moved in and it stopped me in my tracks—my lifelong allergies began to improve along with Jack’s asthma. I then began making more changes. I switched to green cleaning products, started using a green drycleaner, and even gave up my gas guzzling SUV. I soon noticed that I wasn’t spending more money to make these changes—I was actually saving money."


This is the kind of message that can change the attitudes of a whole group of people who still think that being green is the preserve of liberals and hippies, and take it mainstream; I hope that David Bach sells many millions of this book. Also, a buck per copy is being donated to the Waterkeeper Alliance. Its chairman, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, reviewed the book too:


"Great news; there is no green premium! By demonstrating how going green can fit any budget, David Bach shows that good environmental and financial decisions go hand-in-hand. Bach's "Go Green, Live Rich" gives great tips, useful to everyone, about how to save money and the planet at once." Via Treehugger

Obama say I'd hire Al Gore

Sen. Barack Obama said Wednesday he would give Al Gore, a Nobel prize winner, a major role in an Obama administration to address the problem of global warming.

At a town-hall meeting, Obama was asked if he would tap the former vice president for his Cabinet, or an even higher level office, to handle global warming.


"I would," Obama said. "Not only will I, but I will make a commitment that Al Gore will be at the table and play a central part in us figuring out how we solve this problem. He's somebody I talk to on a regular basis. I'm already consulting with him in terms of these issues, but climate change is real. It is something we have to deal with now, not 10 years from now, not 20 years from now."


Vice president?
The only position higher than a Cabinet post is vice president. While Obama seemed to dangle that possibility in his answer Wednesday, he has repeatedly said it is far too early to discuss potential vice presidents because the nomination has not been won.


It is also not clear that Gore, who had the job for eight years under Bill Clinton, would even want to be a vice president again.


Since leaving the White House, Gore has gone on to become one of the world's leading voices for combating the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. His work earned him a share of the Nobel last year.



Popular among Democrats, Gore is perhaps the single most coveted endorsement up for grabs in the long-running competition between Obama and rival Hillary Rodham Clinton.


The relationship between Gore and the Clintons became strained after Gore limited Bill Clinton's campaigning on his behalf in the 2000 presidential race which elected George W. Bush.


Obama said he would use Gore to help forge a cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions designed to lower pollution.


The Illinois senator cautioned that such a system could mean an increase in electricity bills from power companies that rely on coal-burning, and that some of the money generated from a cap-and-trade system may be used in the beginning to help lower income or fixed income customers with those bills. Via MSNBC

SolarCity Launches Leasing Program

solarcityThe idea of “no down payment” is something you hear in loud car commercials, not the cleantech world. But that’s what startup SolarCity is offering San Francisco homeowners who want to go solar, assuming the political spat at City Hall gives way to the Solar Incentive Rebate Program. “You can go solar and save money from day one,” SolarCity CEO Lyndon Rive told us.


The prospect of solar with no upfront payment — yes, we referred to it as free — is part of SolarCity’s new financing plan, which calls for SolarCity to lease, install and maintain residential solar arrays under 15-year contracts. While that “free” deal requires support from the now-frozen San Francisco’s rebate program, even without the city’s backing, SolarLease only requires a $2,000 down payment. That’s much smaller than the cost of buying a system and even less than the $5,000 or so upfront cost installers charge on power purchase agreement installations.


How can SolarCity offer such low installation costs? Rive explains that as a corporate buyer and installer of solar, SolarCity is eligible for tax incentives through the federal investment tax credit (ITC) that individual residences aren’t. This is, however, the same ITC that’s set to expire at the end of this year. “If you’re thinking of going solar you better do it now,” Rive advised. While lease agreements vary, customers’ monthly lease payments should be around the same amount as a “decent” energy bill, Rive said. Oh, and it doesn’t hurt that their financial partner in this endeavor is Morgan Stanley.


SolarCity guarantees a minimum power output and will rebate any shortfalls, while any excess power produced is the customer’s to sell back to the grid. “The return on investment for most customers is anywhere between 15 and 20 percent over a 20-year time period,” Rive told us.


SolarCity claims to have installed more residential solar systems in California than anyone else, and this $2,000 solar (or no down-payment) plan could further solidify SolarCity’s spot as a big player. Last year the company installed 3.5 MW of solar capacity on over 700 homes and created some 200 green-collar jobs, Rive added.


Now Rive tells us that the company is eying an IPO in “maybe in two to three years.” And while he wouldn’t say exactly how many installations the company expects to do in 2008, he did offer this unambiguous tip: “We’re going to do way more than double our installations in the next year.”


At the same time, this isn’t the first time we’ve heard big talk related to solar rental options. Citizenrē, for example, has made promises related to renting solar equipment but has yet to offer a delivery date. “[Our deliver date] is today,” Rive insisted. He estimates that leased panels will be on customers’ roofs within a month. “Maybe in three weeks. We’ve already made some sales; it’s just about getting the permits and getting the panels ready to install.”


The company also expects to double its installation team this year, and has committed to building an academy in San Francisco to train green-collar workers to install their panels. The academy would train 30 employees every two months, and Rive said “They’ll come out as Jedi Knights of [solar] installation.”


SolarCity hopes to expand the SolarLease program into Oregon and Arizona in the next month, he said. The program is an ambitious move that could make solar available to millions more homeowners, but we’ll be convinced when the leased panels start going up in droves. Until then, SolarCity, may the force be with you. Via Earth2tech

Reducing Your Family’s Dependency on The Plastic Bag

By now you know that paper or plastic aren’t your only options when you go to the store. Carrying reusable bags with you is an increasingly popular and easy choice. Many grocery stores sell reusable grocery bags that are inexpensive, durable and carry a lot more than traditional plastic or paper bags.

Reusable bags are a great idea, right? It’s not difficult to see how they fit into a green lifestyle. Sometimes, though, you want a plastic bag to do something like dispose of chicken bones or clean up after your dog. You depend on those bags at times. If you don’t take the plastic bags from the grocery store, what are you going to use for those necessary jobs?

There are lots of other options and most of these options end up in the trash anyway.

Bread bags – Most sandwich breads, hot dog buns, pitas, English muffins and other breads come in plastic bags that get thrown in the trash without a second use. They are a great substitution for plastic grocery bags.

Bags from inside a cereal box – You probably already recycle your cereal boxes, why not get a second use out of the inside bag at the same time. Dump any crumbs at the bottom outside for the birds, and save the bags.

Frozen vegetable bags – If you carefully cut open the bags when you first use them, when they are empty they can be saved.

Newspaper bags – Many home delivery newspapers come in a plastic bag. If you get a newspaper every day, you have one reusable plastic bag each day.

Plastic wrappers from magazines – By carefully opening the wrapper, they can be used a second time before going in the trash.

Goodie bags from birthday parties – My kids always come home with these bags full of candy and little trinkets. Save the bags for a second use.

If you look around your house purposefully, you’ll see many more plastic bags that you usually throw in the trash without using them a second time. These could easily do the same jobs as the plastic grocery bags.

Now, If you’re anything like me, you’ll still end up with plastic bags from grocery stores or other retailers every once in a while. I don’t remember my reusable bags 100% of the time, and sometimes I need to accept a bag. I keep those bags separate and take them to my local grocery store to stick in the recycling bin. More and more stores are placing these bins at the entrance of the store.

Unlike the frozen vegetable bags or wrappers from magazines, grocery and retail plastic bags are recyclable. It makes more sense environmentally to use the non-recyclable bags for the things that end up in the trash, and recycle the bags that can be recycled. Via A Little Greener Every Day

India Tackles Geothermal Power

New Delhi-based power company NTPC signed a memorandum of understanding to work with the government-backed National Geophysical Research Institute to identify potential sites for geothermal power projects in the country. National Thermal Power Corp. (NTPC), a state-controlled entity is India’s largest power company.


The city of Tattapani in the state of Chattisgarh has been selected as the first project site. India, a relative newcomer in the renewable energy market, has not establish any geothermal power. In February, Reykjavik, Iceland-based Glitnir Bank announced a joint venture for geothermal exploration in India Glitnir will partner with Noida, a part of India-based LNJ Bhilwara Group.


India’s National Geophysical Research Institute, established in 1961 in Hyderabad, has a scientific staff of about 200. The institute’s work includes the exploration of hydrocarbon and coal, mineral exploration and engineering geophysics, and exploration, assessment and management of groundwater resources.


NTPC said it has an installed capacity of 29,144 megawatts through 26 power stations, covering nearly 20 percent of India’s installed capacity and contributing 29 percent of the country’s power generation. The company expects to have more than 75,000 MW of capacity by the year 2017. Via Clean Beta

Walkable Towns = Healthy People

Designing walkable communities is a cost-effective way to address the growing epidemic of obesity in the United States and cut down on harmful car emissions and pollution, a researcher told the American College of Sports Medicine's 12th annual Health and Fitness Summit in Long Beach, California.


The problem, said Jim Sallis from San Diego State University, is that local zoning laws essentially prevent the development of walkable communities. "Zoning laws today," he told Reuters Health, "really enforce the separation of uses; they are designed to move cars as quickly as possible -- which is dangerous to pedestrians."


Sallis recently took a tour with urban planners in a new development in San Diego designed to be walkable. "The developers told me they had to get 25 waivers from zoning laws to put in the development. All that kind of paperwork costs the developer time and money so it discourages them from building walkable neighborhoods," Sallis said.


He encourages people to "be a voice for walkable neighborhoods and parks in your area and help change local zoning laws."


Sallis would also like to dispel the misconception that walkable communities are more expensive to build. They aren't, he said, noting that money spent on building, maintaining and expanding roadways could be re-allocated to building sidewalks and trails.


Walkable cities "have worked for thousands of years," Sallis points out. The most walkable cities are on the east coast of the U.S. because they are older. "Any city built in the 1800s is likely to be walkable because everyone who lived there walked. Cities like Boston, Manhattan, Washington D.C., inner Baltimore, Savannah, Charleston, are all very walkable," he noted.


In the west there are fewer walkable cities, except for Portland, which has made a concerted effort to make the city pedestrian-friendly, Sallis said. "Many years ago, Portland set up policies for transportation planning that make pedestrians a first priority, cyclists second, public transit riders third, and car drivers last. It's now one of the most activity-friendly cities in the country."


"The suburbs have really been designed to take away the option of walking to places; there are no sidewalks, everything is spread out, and there is really only one way to get around and that is by car," according to Sallis.


The good news, he said, is that more and more communities are embracing the idea of becoming more activity-friendly by adopting "mixed-use" area laws. Via Yahoo

Recycle a tractor tyre into a child’s sandpit

tyre-sandpit1.jpg

An old tractor tyre makes a fantastic sandpit for the younger set, and is a super easy recycling project. Old tractor tyres are easier to come by than you may think. I got hold of this one by putting a “Wanted” ad on Freecycle and a local smallholder was happy to part with it, I just had to pick it up. For this you need two strong people and a roof-rack on your car, or a trailer. The hardest part of this project is definitely getting the large tyre home, but once you’ve got that out of the way, it’s plain sailing.


Step-by-step instructions:


Step 1: Acquire an old tractor tyre. I recommend giving Freecycle a try, or if you know a farmer, ask him.


Step 2: Scrub the tyre well with a scrubbing brush and some soapy water.


Step 3: Dig out a section of lawn to fit the tyre into. Aim for getting about 1/2 of the width of the tyre into the ground.


Step 4: Once the tyre is in place, dig out the middle some more, go about a foot and a half down to make room for the sand.


Step 5: Fill with sand. You can buy sand specifically for sandpits from garden centres.

Via Eco Street

Toys R Us New Toys - Eco Friendly; Still Made in China

toysrus-logo.jpgNow that the word is out, Toys R Us is going green, it’s time perhaps to look a little harder at exactly what is being offered to parents looking for more safer, healthier toys for their children. After last year’s, lead paint/ phthalate/magnet scares, it’s no wonder Toys R Us is announcing a whole new line of eco friendly toys available in stores in time for Earth Day, April 22, 2008.


But…they’re still made in China.


OK – that’s not completely true. Toys R Us plans to offer a collection of natural and organic toys in three categories:


Organic Cotton Dolls priced at $14.99, manufactured in Egypt


Natural Wooden toys including trucks, trains and blocks, ranging in price from - $9.99 – 14.99 but, made in China


Natural Cotton Plush Animals, including a bear, a lamb and a monkey, also made in China


I spoke to a company representative yesterday, who filled me in on manufacturing locations for their new line which, to my surprise, included that what has become a catch phrase with parents, “Made in China”. Which makes me wonder a bit what exactly Toys R Us is trying to accomplish?


I guess the answer is, Toys R Us is jumping on the environmentally friendly – “good for the planet” bandwagon while ignoring (OK that’s a bit harsh) – the “good for the child” part. So, what’s more important? What are parents’ primary concerns, health and safety or saving the planet?


And…let’s not even go there on the use of the word, “natural”. More or less unregulated, any company, with a semi clear conscious can use the term, natural to describe their product, as long as it is made primarily of natural materials.


So, until additional information is available, I’m going to be a bit skeptical. I’m hoping the folks at Toys R Us are going to send some samples over to Toy Tips, the fanatically independent testing group, for analysis, as well as to our friends at Consumer Reports.


While certainly not all products made in China are unsafe and toys labeled natural often are, parental perceptions may play a big part in how successful these new toys are. Transparency will rule the day. Via Eco Childs Play

Can Gore and $300M in Ads Move the Needle on Climate Change?

The fight against climate change in the U.S. is getting billions of VC dollars for tech innovation, the attention of presidential candidates, and game-changing legislation. So what else could it possibly need? Better advertising, at least according to Nobel Peace Prize winner and former Vice President Al Gore.


Gore is working with the non-profit Alliance for Climate Protection to launch a $300 million, three-year-long ad campaign that advocates carbon-reducing policies, according to the Washington Post. The group, which was founded by Gore, has just put its first ad online; the “We” campaign is also slated to launch Wednesday on TV. One spot will supposedly feature the bizarre duo of Pat Robertson and Al Sharpton bonding over climate change policy — and that will convince…?





That is a whole lotta funding for a public advocacy campaign, and tops annual spending for anti-smoking and anti-drug campaigns. Gore himself is donating his salary from his Kleiner Perkins VC gig (but not his stock options, noted the AP), as well as his prize winnings and the proceeds from both his book and his documentary; the WaPo estimates Gore’s donation at around $2.5 million, and the rest will come from private contributors.

The Alliance for Climate Protection has also worked with Gore’s cable TV venture Current TV to get viewers to make and submit “ecospots” (short, global warming-themed videos). Guess the whole user-generated thing wasn’t really gaining the kind of viewership Gore wanted, and so now he’s turning to the professionals. We’ll see if they fare any better, and if the $300 million ends up being a good investment or not.

For all you cleantech startups out there, if this campaign is successful, it could go a long way to convincing policy makers and the public that we need that carbon legislation on which you’re banking your futures. Via Earth2tech

Al Gore Announces Bid for Vice Presidency

In an interview with the New York Times published today, Al Gore has officially declared his intention to secure the vice presidential nomination. He said that he has spoken with both the Hillary camp and the Barack camp and has made his intentions very clear in his most confident voice to date:

There’s no question about it. Whoever I am standing with in November will win.

I told both of them that it’d be a big mistake not to consider me for the vice presidency. In the last couple of years, we have gained momentum for the fight against global warming. This political capital needs to be spent now before it gets squandered.

This makes sense of the ex-vice president’s refusal to endorse either candidate. So are we going to have a Clinton-Gore or an Obama-Gore ticket come November? Your thoughts? Via Greenwix

Energy Efficiency or the price of inaction

Shock, horror, and surprise! The price of electricity may rise ten-fold in the next decade. This more than obvious statement, by ex-Woolworths CEO and current Reserve Bank board member Roger Corbett, is not news to a lot of us. Talk about Sherlock Holmes!

When a carbon cap and trade system is instigated by the Australian Government, the only real option for the coal burning power generators who will be forced to pay for the carbon emissions they produce, will be to increase their wholesale Kilowatt hour charge to the energy retailers. The retailers, will in turn, pass it on to us, Joe public the consumer.

Foreseen this event, I have (sounds like Yoda), because not only being a clean power source, my solar PV system payback period will be quicker and the cost of my electricity will not rise. Under a renewable energy feed-in tariff system, I may even get paid for producing clean electricity.

I believe that the rising price of electricity will force two events, a massive effort in energy efficiency and rapid installation of renewable energy systems. The rising price will stimulate a surge in large Renewable Energy installations who will generating carbon credits which the heavy emitters will be forced to buy (or so I am assuming). I also believe that Australia is ill equipped at the moment to help its citizens perform the huge savings that are available with energy efficiency. Sure the black balloon adds are great here in Victoria, but you would be amazed at the amount of people I talk to in my travels that still have not even contemplated of instigating this simple and powerful step to reducing their household costs and carbon footprint. I could save a household 50% of their energy bill if they are willing to make a simple behavioural change. Turn stuff off when not in use! And I suppose that is all it takes, a simple change. But people are scared of change, and change is very similar to the fear of the unknown. Most humans don't like the unknown, but some, if not more these days, are willing to weigh up the risks of not changing and try to make a difference to their behaviours for the sake of future generations.

This is one of the reasons I found the ABC television show "Carbon Cops" so fascinating. I was amazed with the glazed look on some of the families faces when confronted with the truth about their energy consumption. That is not to say that I was an energy saving saint before my family begun our journey towards sustainable living. So you see what I mean. There are a heck of a lot of people do not know where to start or are unwilling to start because the cost per kWh is so cheap.

Do I have a solution? Not yet, but I am hoping that this blog has helped inform people with real life examples over the past few months. By keeping the simple things front of mind, I hope, with a bit of luck, that even one person will swap out a blown incandescent light bulb with a nice energy efficient Compact Fluorescent Light or LED light instead. If that is all I achieve by writing this blog, then it is a result that motivates me to continue writing, and one I would be proud of.

It is the simple things that can made all the difference. If you refer back to here and here, you will see some of the steps that I took around our house to reduce our electricity consumption with energy efficient behaviours alone, by 52.1% over the period of 15 weeks. My Summer power bill has gone from A$726 to A$150. Now there is a savings for you.

So who cares if electricity prices rise? If you have energy efficiency on your side, and renewable energy then you need not worry. With all things being equal, even GreenPower should be cheaper than coal based power after carbon cap and trade is enforced. I am very optimistic about the future. Bring on the Sun and the Wind! Via The Greening of Gavin

Dick Cheney goes green

Well, after all this time making fun of Darth Cheney and his huge negative impact on environmental issues, it looks like he is crossing over from the dark side. This morning's New York Times reports that Dick has decided to jump on the green bandwagon and start lowering his carbon footprint.

As vice-president, I've seen firsthand how important it is to preserve the Earth for our children and grandchildren. One of the resounding actions I want to accomplish during the rest of this term is to make a positive change in that direction. And that positive change starts with me. Lynne and I are looking into solar panels, potential geo-thermal heating and Lynn has her eye on a Tango...

Perhaps Dick is a little concerned that Lynne is going to be swept off her feet by George Clooney and his tiny Tango. While I'm a little dubious over the sincerity of his statements, we'll have to wait and see.

Dick also stated that he regrets voting against the Clean Water Act and air pollution sanctions in the 1980s and wishes he had started working toward a cleaner environment while he still had the chance. While he may not quite be ready to hang up his snowmobile, it's a step in the right direction. Via Crunchy Chichen